Jalen Coker or Michael Wilson?
Start Jalen Coker. Coker projects 0.0 points clear of Michael Wilson in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Wilson.
Jalen Coker
StartTools
Loading this fantasy football tool.
Tools
Before you lock in a kicker or a quarterback, check this week's game day weather.
Week 8
Real Week 8 comparisons with the verdict already worked out. Open any of them on the board for the full breakdown.
Start Jalen Coker. Coker projects 0.0 points clear of Michael Wilson in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Wilson.
Jalen Coker
StartThe method
It starts with a weekly point projection from Sleeper, rescored under the format set in the site header rather than left in one generic scoring. That single adjustment is why a TE premium league or a superflex league can see a different lean than a standard league for the same two players.
Still not sure?
The confidence figure gives you a clear lean, but a close start/sit call can stay close. Bring it to our Discord and real fantasy managers will help you settle it for free. Want to know what's behind FF Beacon? Read about the project.
WR
CAR
16.4 projected points
Michael Wilson
SitWR
ARI
16.3 projected points
Start Bucky Irving. Irving projects 0.0 points clear of Jonathan Taylor in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Taylor.
Bucky Irving
StartRB
TB
16.8 projected points
Jonathan Taylor
SitRB
IND
16.8 projected points
Start Carnell Tate. Tate projects 0.0 points clear of Matthew Golden in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Golden.
Carnell Tate
StartWR
TEN
13.7 projected points
Matthew Golden
SitWR
GB
13.7 projected points
Start Christian Watson. Watson projects 0.0 points clear of Garrett Wilson in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Wilson.
Christian Watson
StartWR
GB
16.3 projected points
Garrett Wilson
SitWR
NYJ
16.3 projected points
Start Dak Prescott. Prescott projects 0.0 points clear of Drake Maye in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Maye.
Dak Prescott
StartQB
DAL
22.5 projected points
Drake Maye
SitQB
NE
22.4 projected points
Start Jayden Daniels. Daniels projects 0.0 points clear of Bryce Young in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Young.
Jayden Daniels
StartQB
WAS
18.2 projected points
Bryce Young
SitQB
CAR
18.2 projected points
Start George Pickens. Pickens projects 0.0 points clear of Tetairoa McMillan in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore McMillan.
George Pickens
StartWR
DAL
14.9 projected points
Tetairoa McMillan
SitWR
CAR
14.9 projected points
Start Harold Fannin Jr.. Jr. projects 0.0 points clear of Brenton Strange in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Strange.
Harold Fannin Jr.
StartTE
CLE
11.0 projected points
Brenton Strange
SitTE
JAX
10.9 projected points
Start CeeDee Lamb. Lamb projects 0.1 points clear of Puka Nacua in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Nacua.
CeeDee Lamb
StartWR
DAL
22.5 projected points
Puka Nacua
SitWR
LAR
22.5 projected points
Start Chad Ryland. Ryland projects 0.0 points clear of Jake Bates in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Bates.
Chad Ryland
StartK
ARI
8.4 projected points
Jake Bates
SitK
DET
8.4 projected points
Start Tucker Kraft. Kraft projects 0.0 points clear of Sam LaPorta in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore LaPorta.
Tucker Kraft
StartTE
GB
11.2 projected points
Sam LaPorta
SitTE
DET
11.1 projected points
Start Minnesota Vikings. Vikings projects 0.1 points clear of Cleveland Browns in Redraft 1QB PPR, 51 percent to outscore Browns.
Minnesota Vikings
StartDEF
MIN
6.5 projected points
Cleveland Browns
SitDEF
CLE
6.4 projected points
Next comes the matchup: how many fantasy points the opposing defense has allowed to that position, measured from our own player-by-player results rather than taken from the projection source, and adjusted for the strength of the offenses that defense actually faced. It blends the two most recent seasons of games actually played, weighting the more recent one heavier.
Then a reliability discount: how often the player has actually beaten the player's own projection in games graded so far this season, and how often the player has been available to play at all. A boom-or-bust player gets pulled back toward the field; a steady one keeps more of that projected number.
Finally, the confidence figure: the probability that the player you are told to start actually outscores the closest player left on the bench, built from the same win-probability math the League Pulse schedule board uses to grade a matchup.
Projections and injury designations refresh once a day; the timestamp above the board is the exact time the numbers you are looking at were last pulled.
Scoring formats
The format chip at the top of the board follows whatever you have set in the site header, and every player's projection is repriced under that scoring rather than shown once in a single format. PPR and half PPR change how much a high-target pass catcher is worth next to a workhorse runner; standard drops the reception bonus entirely and shifts the whole board toward touchdowns and yardage.
TE premium and superflex are treated as real formats here, not a checkbox bolted onto a PPR number, because both change who the better start actually is. For a deeper look at where a player ranks under your own scoring, see the full Redraft 1QB PPR rankings board or browse rankings for every format we support.
Your board is set to
Redraft 1QB PPR
Change it from the format control in the site header.
Volume decides most quarterback weeks before the matchup does. A quarterback who throws forty times and adds rushing work on top can outscore a tougher matchup through pure opportunity, which is why the projection starts from expected attempts and carries, not from a single highlight-worthy throw. After volume, the tool weighs the matchup: how many points the opposing defense has allowed to the position, adjusted for the offenses that defense actually faced. Game environment matters too. A quarterback expected to trail throws more; one expected to lead runs the clock out and throws less. Rushing floor is usually what separates two similar passers when their passing numbers project close together.
Start Dak Prescott. Prescott projects 0.0 points clear of Drake Maye in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Maye.
Full breakdown: Prescott vs MayeTarget share moves a wide receiver's projection more than any other number, because a receiver who sees the ball ten times a game keeps a real floor even on a week the catches go for short gains. After volume, the tool looks at the matchup a receiver actually draws, the gap between a shadow cornerback and a zone look, folded into the defense's points allowed to the position rather than guessed at separately. Game script cuts the other way from running backs: a team expected to trail throws more, which lifts every pass catcher on the roster, including one who would otherwise look like the week's riskier option.
Target share does the most work at tight end, because touchdown-dependent, boom-or-bust production is what separates a usable weekly starter from a name a reader only half recognizes. The tool leans on route participation and red-zone role ahead of raw catch totals, since a tight end on the field for every pass play keeps a real floor even in a game that never turns into a shootout. Matchup still counts, particularly against a defense that struggles to cover the position out of its base personnel, but the gap between replacement level and the position's best players is unusually wide, so role tends to beat matchup more often here than it does at wide receiver.
A flex spot compares players across positions directly on projected points, which is exactly what this tool does: whichever player projects to score more, once matchup, role, and reliability are folded in, is the better start regardless of position. A running back's weekly floor usually comes from touches guaranteed regardless of how the game unfolds, while a receiver's ceiling usually comes from a matchup or a script that favors the pass, so the flex call is often a trade-off between the two rather than a clear edge for either position. When the projections sit close together, the confidence figure and the reliability numbers are the tiebreaker worth trusting over raw upside.
In order
Start with the projection: it already accounts for volume, role, and game script, so it beats a gut feeling about a name you recognize.
Weigh the matchup next, favorable or tough, but treat it as a nudge on a close projection rather than a reason to overturn a clear one.
If your team is favored, lean toward the safer floor between two similar options; if you are the underdog, lean toward the higher ceiling, since a spot start is worth more when you are chasing points than when you are protecting a lead.
Check injury status and weather last, after the numbers, since a limited practice designation or a wind forecast only matters once you know which players were close to begin with.
Never bench a clearly better player over a tough matchup alone; a stud facing a hard matchup is still usually a better start than a replacement-level player facing an easy one.
FAQ
Comparing up to 8 players at once is built into the board above; nothing here requires an account.
Yes. Add up to 8 players to one board and set how many of them you plan to start. The tool ranks the whole group and shows where the close calls sit, alongside the top pick.
It reprices every player under the format set in the site header, including PPR, half PPR, standard, TE premium, and superflex. Connect a Sleeper league from the board and the verdict switches to that league's own literal scoring rules instead of a generic format.
It is the probability that the player you are told to start actually outscores the closest player left on your bench, built from each player's projected points and how much those points tend to vary week to week. A figure near 50 percent means the call is close; one near 100 percent means it is not.
Projections and injury designations refresh once a day. The timestamp shown above the board is the exact time the numbers below it were last pulled.
Yes. Running a comparison costs nothing and does not require an account.
A ranking is a rest-of-season opinion; this verdict is for one week only. A player can sit ahead of another for the rest of the year and still be the worse start in a single week with a tougher matchup or a bye.
Whichever one this tool ranks higher for the week you are setting. Points are compared directly across positions here, which is exactly what a flex decision calls for, and the higher-ranked player is the better start regardless of position.
League Pulse
This tool answers one question at a time: of the players you put in, which ones to start. League Pulse answers a bigger one, your whole starting lineup for the week, filled from your actual Sleeper roster under your league's real scoring.
Start Jayden Daniels. Daniels projects 0.0 points clear of Bryce Young in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Young.
Put Daniels and Young on the boardStart Joe Burrow. Burrow projects 0.2 points clear of Trevor Lawrence in Redraft 1QB PPR, 51 percent to outscore Lawrence.
Check Burrow against LawrenceWorkload settles most running back decisions. Carries plus targets, not yards per carry, is the strongest predictor of a week's points, so the tool weighs a back's expected touch share ahead of anything about breakaway speed. Matchup counts for less here than reputation suggests: a defense that is stout against the run can still give up a pile of points through the passing game, so a back who catches passes keeps a real floor even against a tough front. Goal-line and short-yardage role adds touchdown equity a pure yardage projection misses, which is why work inside the ten is tracked as its own input rather than folded into one blended rate.
Start Bucky Irving. Irving projects 0.0 points clear of Jonathan Taylor in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Taylor.
Full breakdown: Irving vs TaylorStart Josh Jacobs. Jacobs projects 0.1 points clear of James Cook III in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore III.
Put Jacobs and III on the boardStart Jaylen Warren. Warren projects 0.1 points clear of Bhayshul Tuten in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Tuten.
Check Warren against TutenStart Jalen Coker. Coker projects 0.0 points clear of Michael Wilson in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Wilson.
Full breakdown: Coker vs WilsonStart Carnell Tate. Tate projects 0.0 points clear of Matthew Golden in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Golden.
Put Tate and Golden on the boardStart Christian Watson. Watson projects 0.0 points clear of Garrett Wilson in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Wilson.
Check Watson against WilsonStart Harold Fannin Jr.. Jr. projects 0.0 points clear of Brenton Strange in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Strange.
Full breakdown: Jr. vs StrangeStart Tucker Kraft. Kraft projects 0.0 points clear of Sam LaPorta in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore LaPorta.
Put Kraft and LaPorta on the boardStart Sam LaPorta. LaPorta projects 0.1 points clear of T.J. Hockenson in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Hockenson.
Check LaPorta against HockensonDefense and kicker both live and die by game script more than most positions. A defense's points lean heavily on takeaways and touchdowns, among the least predictable events in football, so the matchup, an opponent's turnover rate and offensive line quality, carries more weight here than for an offensive skill position. A kicker's floor is field goal volume, which rises in a game expected to stall in the red zone and falls in one expected to end in touchdowns, so the same game-environment signal that lowers a kicker's outlook often raises the defense's. Both are the most matchup-driven calls on the board and worth checking against the week's projected team totals.
Start Chad Ryland. Ryland projects 0.0 points clear of Jake Bates in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Bates.
Full breakdown: Ryland vs BatesStart Evan McPherson. McPherson projects 0.1 points clear of Chase McLaughlin in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore McLaughlin.
Put McPherson and McLaughlin on the boardStart Minnesota Vikings. Vikings projects 0.1 points clear of Cleveland Browns in Redraft 1QB PPR, 51 percent to outscore Browns.
Check Vikings against Browns