Send Ladd McConkey to @nathanieb30 for David Montgomery.
Why this one: This is a one-year league, so the ranking is about what a deal does to your lineup rather than what an asset holds for later. @nathanieb30 are chasing this season, so what they can spare is the depth behind their starters. Your lineup is short at RB, about 3.0 points a week behind, and this deal lands there.
You get
David MontgomeryRunning back, HOU. value 5,110, 15.6 pts/wk, age 29.3
Total value 5,110
You send
Ladd McConkeyWide receiver, LAC. value 5,453, 11.9 pts/wk, age 24.8
Total value 5,453
What it does
- Your lineup
- Your starting lineup: +3.7 points a week
- Projected wins
- Your projected wins, estimated: your season gains about 0.56 of a win over the games you have left
- Your value
- Your trade value: -343 points
- Their lineup
- Their starting lineup: -1.4 points a week
- Value gap
- Value gap between the two sides: 6 percent
Your starting lineup gains +3.7 points a week at RB. Against your remaining schedule that is worth about 0.56 of a projected win. You give up 343 points of trade value to do it.
@nathanieb30 reads as a contender chasing this season, so the case has to be the value. They finish 343 points of value ahead.
The message
What do you think of me sending you Ladd McConkey, and you sending back David Montgomery? On value it is close to even both ways.