Loading your Sleeper league.
League Pulse
Redraft PPR Superflex
Roster
Scoring
Last updated 2 minutes ago (served from cache),values via FF Beacon, Redraft PPR SF
Loading filters
Loading transactions
Refine
The feed opens on trades. Uncheck every type to see waivers and free agent moves too.
Feed
10 trades. Graded by Signal Check using FF Beacon values in Redraft PPR SF.
Total value received, 0 points
Acquired
Cooper RushQBVerdict: Even trade
Values via FF Beacon, Redraft PPR SF
Trade graded by Signal Check
Beacon Verdict
3.4%
value margin
Trade graded by Signal Check
Beacon Verdict
100%
value margin
Trade graded by Signal Check
Beacon Verdict
38%
value margin
Trade graded by Signal Check
Beacon Verdict
100%
value margin
Trade graded by Signal Check
Beacon Verdict
38%
value margin
Trade graded by Signal Check
Beacon Verdict
19.2%
value margin
Some assets in this trade lack value data; differential may be incomplete.
Value balance
footballpeople holds about 52 percent of the trade value and _Taz holds about 48 percent. footballpeople is favored.
Receives
Receives
The read
Side A wins by 3.4% of total trade value. The deal grades as a depth package.
How close
One side comes out ahead, but the gap is not huge. Team needs could still tip the scales.
Value balance
Abhinavgoel459 holds about 100 percent of the trade value and Team 29 holds about 0 percent. Abhinavgoel459 is favored.
Receives
Receives
The read
Side A wins by 100% of total trade value. Side A receives the strongest individual asset in the deal. The deal grades as a stud-for-stud swap. Note: one or more assets had no FF Beacon value and were excluded from the totals.
How close
This is a lopsided trade by value. One side is getting a lot more than the other.
One or more assets had no FF Beacon value, so they were left out of the totals. The verdict is based on the rest.
Value balance
Team 1 holds about 69 percent of the trade value and LivvM holds about 31 percent. Team 1 is favored.
Receives
Receives
The read
Side A wins by 38% of total trade value. Side A receives the strongest individual asset in the deal. Side A carries the more concentrated package, so the smaller pieces on the other side, the ones worth under half the best asset in the deal, count for less than their face value. The deal grades as a roster clog risk. Note: one or more assets had no FF Beacon value and were excluded from the totals.
How close
This is a lopsided trade by value. One side is getting a lot more than the other.
One or more assets had no FF Beacon value, so they were left out of the totals. The verdict is based on the rest.
Value balance
khendo14 holds about 100 percent of the trade value and Team 29 holds about 0 percent. khendo14 is favored.
Receives
Receives
The read
Side A wins by 100% of total trade value. Side A receives the strongest individual asset in the deal. The deal grades as a stud-for-stud swap. Note: one or more assets had no FF Beacon value and were excluded from the totals.
How close
This is a lopsided trade by value. One side is getting a lot more than the other.
One or more assets had no FF Beacon value, so they were left out of the totals. The verdict is based on the rest.
Value balance
Team 25 holds about 31 percent of the trade value and Chiefeph holds about 69 percent. Chiefeph is favored.
Receives
Receives
The read
Side B wins by 38% of total trade value. Side B receives the strongest individual asset in the deal. Side B carries the more concentrated package, so the smaller pieces on the other side, the ones worth under half the best asset in the deal, count for less than their face value. The deal grades as a consolidation trade.
How close
This is a lopsided trade by value. One side is getting a lot more than the other.
Value balance
khendo14 holds about 40 percent of the trade value and Chiefeph holds about 60 percent. Chiefeph is favored.
Receives
Receives
The read
Side B wins by 19.2% of total trade value. Side B receives the strongest individual asset in the deal. Side B carries the more concentrated package, so the smaller pieces on the other side, the ones worth under half the best asset in the deal, count for less than their face value. The deal grades as a consolidation trade. Note: one or more assets had no FF Beacon value and were excluded from the totals.
How close
One side comes out ahead, but the gap is not huge. Team needs could still tip the scales.
One or more assets had no FF Beacon value, so they were left out of the totals. The verdict is based on the rest.
