Worth asking
Send Carnell Tate to @footballpeople for Mike Evans.
Why this one: This is a one-year league, so the ranking is about what a deal does to your lineup rather than what an asset holds for later. @footballpeople are chasing this season, so what they can spare is the depth behind their starters. Your lineup is short at WR, about 3.6 points a week behind, and this deal lands there.
You get
Mike EvansWide receiver, SF. value 3,511, 18.3 pts/wk, age 33.2
Total value 3,511
You send
Carnell TateWide receiver, TEN. value 3,621, 14.2 pts/wk, age 21.8
Total value 3,621
What it does
- Your lineup
- Your starting lineup: +4.1 points a week
- Your value
- Your trade value: -110 points
- Their lineup
- Their starting lineup: -4.1 points a week
- Value gap
- Value gap between the two sides: 3 percent
Your starting lineup gains +4.1 points a week at WR. You give up 110 points of trade value to do it.
@footballpeople reads as a bubble team chasing this season, so the case has to be the value. They finish 110 points of value ahead.
The message
What do you think of me sending you Carnell Tate, and you sending back Mike Evans? On value it is close to even both ways.