Send Omarion Hampton to @Groovyk for Matthew Golden.
Why this one: This is a one-year league, so the ranking is about what a deal does to your lineup rather than what an asset holds for later. @Groovyk are chasing this season, so what they can spare is the depth behind their starters. Your lineup is short at WR, about 4.2 points a week behind, and this deal lands there.
You get
Matthew GoldenWide receiver, GB. value 4,287, 13.3 pts/wk, age 23.2
Total value 4,287
You send
Omarion HamptonRunning back, LAC. value 4,225, 10.2 pts/wk, age 23.6
Total value 4,225
What it does
- Your lineup
- Your starting lineup: +3.4 points a week
- Projected wins
- Your projected wins, estimated: your season gains about 0.21 of a win over the games you have left
- Your value
- Your trade value: +62 points
- Their lineup
- Their starting lineup: no change
- Value gap
- Value gap between the two sides: 1 percent
Your starting lineup gains +3.4 points a week at WR. Against your remaining schedule that is worth about 0.21 of a projected win. You come out 62 points of trade value ahead.
@Groovyk reads as a contender chasing this season, so the case has to be the value. They take on 62 points less value than they send.
The message
What do you think of me sending you Omarion Hampton, and you sending back Matthew Golden? On value it is close to even both ways.