Lineup change
Week 8@JKsGMen started Khalil Shakir and DeVonta Smith over George Kittle, Woody Marks and Alvin Kamara
Lineups are still movable this week.
Loading your Sleeper league.
New to chopped leagues? Read the chopped league strategy guide.
League Pulse
Redraft PPR
Roster
Scoring
Last updated 41 minutes ago (served from cache),values via FF Beacon, Redraft 1QB PPR
Loading rankings
League activity
5 entries from the last 30 days. Trades, claims, lineup edits, results and rule changes, newest first, refreshed whenever the league syncs.
Lineup change
Week 8Lineups are still movable this week.
Lineup change
Week 7Somebody read a Wednesday practice report.
Lineup change
Week 7Somebody read a Wednesday practice report.
Lineup change
Week 7Somebody read a Wednesday practice report.
Lineup change
Week 4Lineups are still movable this week.
Projected
Survival favorite
@blitang
24%to outlast them all
Is the last team standing 24% of the time across every simulated season.
This week
@chicruz
Eliminated in week 7, out on 824.8 points for the season.
11 teams still in, 7 out.
Scarcity
Running back is hardest to replace here, quarterback easiest.
| Position | Best one adds | How many this league starts |
|---|---|---|
| RB | 1.76 | 47 |
| WR | 1.50 | 66 |
| TE | 0.90 | 31 |
| QB | 0.78 | 18 |
Top 12 at each position. The full chart runs to 36.
Explore Positional WARLeaderboards
Every player counts, rostered or not, scored under this league's own settings.
36.5 points
31.3 points
28.9 points
153.8 points
Activity
League totals up top. The bars count per team, so a trade counts for both sides. 393 failed waiver claims are left out.
@blitang has been the busiest team with 57 moves. @YungRich14 has the fewest with 3. 360 completed transactions in this league so far.
@blitang
@nlit
@chicruz
@mikeq672
@itzblackmamba
| Team | Total | Trades | Waivers | Free agents |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @blitang | 57 | 9 | 17 | 31 |
| @nlit | 56 | 9 | 15 | 29 |
| @chicruz | 38 | 2 | 15 | 20 |
| @mikeq672 | 34 | 2 | 15 | 17 |
| @itzblackmamba | 27 | 3 | 6 | 18 |
| @cfender993 | 26 |
Superlatives
The things a rankings table cannot tell you.
blitang
24%
Outlasts the whole league most often across every simulated season.
@cfender993
@JKsGMen
@BrockPurdy69
@Kaleb4213
@kato711
@tlit8
@SaquanDeezNuts1
@Bros2086
@DRoGe
@willbliss
@AGreatSouledman1
@Stoney67
@YungRich14
| 6 |
| 5 |
| 15 |
| @JKsGMen | 22 | 2 | 8 | 12 |
|---|
| @BrockPurdy69 | 19 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
|---|
| @Kaleb4213 | 18 | 1 | 10 | 7 |
|---|
| @kato711 | 18 | 1 | 11 | 6 |
|---|
| @tlit8 | 15 | 4 | 1 | 9 |
|---|
| @SaquanDeezNuts1 | 13 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
|---|
| @Bros2086 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
|---|
| @DRoGe | 9 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
|---|
| @willbliss | 8 | 0 | 7 | 0 |
|---|
| @AGreatSouledman1 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
|---|
| @Stoney67 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
|---|
| @YungRich14 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
|---|
Totals also count moves a commissioner made, which are not broken out here.
JKsGMen
16%
The likeliest team to post the lowest score in the league this week.
nlit
100%
Starts the closest thing to its best possible lineup this week. Tied with 5 other teams.
Stoney67
7.5 pts
Loses the most projected points to a suboptimal starting lineup.
mikeq672
+2.4%
Its starters beat their own projections more often than anyone else's.
blitang
-3%
Loses the least output when a position's best starter goes down.
cfender993
+3 spots
Competes far better than its trade-value ranking suggests. Tied with 1 other team.
itzblackmamba
-6 spots
Holds far more trade value than its lineup converts into wins.
Standings
Expected performance from here, in this league's scoring. Team value without picks, via FF Beacon.
| Rank | Team | Pulse | Outlook | QB | RB | WR | TE | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 92, 1st of 18 | Contend | 3rd, top three | 8th | 1st, top three | 1st, top three | 68,998, 2nd in the league by value | |
| 2 | 91, 2nd of 18 | Contend | 1st, top three | 7th | 2nd, top three | 5th | 69,591, 1st in the league by value | |
| 3 | 81, 3rd of 18 | Contend | 9th | 2nd, top three | 8th | 7th | 58,280, 3rd in the league by value | |
| 4 | 71, 4th of 18 | Contend | 5th | 5th | 9th | 2nd, top three | 57,270, 4th in the league by value | |
| 5 | 57, 5th of 18 | Bubble | 11th | 4th | 5th | 3rd, top three | 54,092, 6th in the league by value | |
| 6 | 54, 6th of 18 | Bubble | 7th | 6th | 7th | 8th | 53,232, 9th in the league by value | |
| 7 | 27, 7th of 18 | Bubble | 10th | 1st, top three | 11th | 9th | 53,513, 8th in the league by value | |
| 8 | 26, 8th of 18 | Bubble | 6th | 10th | 6th | 10th | 48,344, 11th in the league by value | |
| 9 | 18, 9th of 18 | Longshot | 8th | 3rd, top three | 10th | 4th | 54,072, 7th in the league by value | |
| 10 | 14, 10th of 18 | Longshot | 2nd, top three | 11th | 3rd, top three | 11th | 48,954, 10th in the league by value | |
| 11 | 10, 11th of 18 | Longshot | 4th | 9th | 4th | 6th | 55,109, 5th in the league by value | |
| 12 | Not calculated yet | - | No rank | No rank | No rank | No rank | 0, 12th in the league by value | |
| 13 | Not calculated yet | - | No rank | No rank | No rank | No rank | 0, 13th in the league by value | |
| 14 | Not calculated yet | - | No rank | No rank | No rank | No rank | 0, 14th in the league by value | |
| 15 | Not calculated yet | - | No rank | No rank | No rank | No rank | 0, 15th in the league by value | |
| 16 | Not calculated yet | - | No rank | No rank | No rank | No rank | 0, 16th in the league by value | |
| 17 | Not calculated yet | - | No rank | No rank | No rank | No rank | 0, 17th in the league by value | |
| 18 | Not calculated yet | - | No rank | No rank | No rank | No rank | 0, 18th in the league by value |