Seacorp group 1

The read

Side A wins by 32.4% of total trade value. Side A receives the strongest individual asset in the deal. The deal grades as a consolidation trade.

How close

This is a lopsided trade by value. One side is getting a lot more than the other.

The read

Side A wins by 27.1% of total trade value. Side A receives the strongest individual asset in the deal. Side A carries the more concentrated package, so the smaller pieces on the other side, the ones worth under half the best asset in the deal, count for less than their face value.

How close

This is a lopsided trade by value. One side is getting a lot more than the other.

The read

No verdict. One side of this trade is only defensive players, and no value source prices defensive players, so there is nothing to compare.

How close

One side of this trade is only defensive players, and no value source prices defensive players, so there is nothing to compare.

The read

Side A wins by 47.7% of total trade value. Side A receives the strongest individual asset in the deal. Side A carries the more concentrated package, so the smaller pieces on the other side, the ones worth under half the best asset in the deal, count for less than their face value. The deal grades as a consolidation trade. Partial grade: excludes 1 defensive player no value source prices.

How close

This is a lopsided trade by value. One side is getting a lot more than the other.

The read

Side B wins by 4.8% of total trade value. Side B receives the strongest individual asset in the deal. The deal grades as a stud-for-stud swap.

How close

One side comes out ahead, but the gap is not huge. Team needs could still tip the scales.

The read

Side B wins by 39.8% of total trade value. Side B receives the strongest individual asset in the deal. The deal grades as a consolidation trade.

How close

This is a lopsided trade by value. One side is getting a lot more than the other.

The read

Side A wins by 28.4% of total trade value. Side A receives the strongest individual asset in the deal. Side A carries the more concentrated package, so the smaller pieces on the other side, the ones worth under half the best asset in the deal, count for less than their face value. The deal grades as a consolidation trade.

How close

This is a lopsided trade by value. One side is getting a lot more than the other.

The read

Side A wins by 33.5% of total trade value. Side A receives the strongest individual asset in the deal. The deal grades as a consolidation trade.

How close

This is a lopsided trade by value. One side is getting a lot more than the other.

The read

Side A wins by 27.2% of total trade value. Side A receives the strongest individual asset in the deal. Side A carries the more concentrated package, so the smaller pieces on the other side, the ones worth under half the best asset in the deal, count for less than their face value. The deal grades as a consolidation trade.

How close

This is a lopsided trade by value. One side is getting a lot more than the other.

The read

No verdict. One side of this trade is only defensive players, and no value source prices defensive players, so there is nothing to compare.

How close

One side of this trade is only defensive players, and no value source prices defensive players, so there is nothing to compare.

The read

Side B wins by 9.1% of total trade value.

How close

One side comes out ahead, but the gap is not huge. Team needs could still tip the scales.

The read

No verdict. One side of this trade is only defensive players, and no value source prices defensive players, so there is nothing to compare.

How close

One side of this trade is only defensive players, and no value source prices defensive players, so there is nothing to compare.

The read

No verdict. One side of this trade is only defensive players, and no value source prices defensive players, so there is nothing to compare.

How close

One side of this trade is only defensive players, and no value source prices defensive players, so there is nothing to compare.