Final score
No Discount Zone beat Kendre's Krusaders, 110.2 to 70.0
The points were on the roster. They were just sitting down.
Winner
Loser
Loading your Sleeper league.
League Pulse
Dynasty PPR Superflex TEP
Roster
Scoring
Last updated 8 minutes ago (served from cache),values via FF Beacon, Dynasty PPR SF TEP
Loading rankings
League activity
6 entries on record. Trades, claims, lineup edits, results and rule changes, newest first, refreshed whenever the league syncs.
Final score
The points were on the roster. They were just sitting down.
Winner
Loser
Kendre's Krusaders left 89.7 on the bench, more than the 40.2 they lost by.
Final score
The bench outscored the lineup, which is its own kind of loss.
Winner
Loser
@jlouie1588 left 61.4 on the bench, more than the 52.2 they lost by.
Final score
The points were on the roster. They were just sitting down.
Winner
Loser
MVPurdy left 84.0 on the bench, more than the 6.8 they lost by.
Final score
The bench outscored the lineup, which is its own kind of loss.
Winner
Loser
No Discount Zone left 78.4 on the bench, more than the 4.0 they lost by.
Final score
The bench outscored the lineup, which is its own kind of loss.
Winner
Loser
No Discount Zone left 80.6 on the bench, more than the 62.6 they lost by.
Final score
The points were on the roster. They were just sitting down.
Winner
Loser
@FizzleK7 left 75.3 on the bench, more than the 43.7 they lost by.
Projected
Title favorite
Dirty Mike (@DirtyMike205)
34%to win it all
Wins this league 34% of the time across every simulated season.
Scarcity
Running back is hardest to replace here, quarterback easiest.
| Position | Best one adds | How many this league starts |
|---|---|---|
| RB | 1.19 | 28 |
| WR | 1.02 | 41 |
| TE | 0.84 | 27 |
| QB | 0.81 | 24 |
Top 12 at each position. The full chart runs to 36.
Explore Positional WARLeaderboards
Every player counts, rostered or not, scored under this league's own settings.
36.9 points
36.5 points
34.6 points
166.8 points
Activity
League totals up top. The bars count per team, so a trade counts for both sides. 64 failed waiver claims are left out.
@FFSnoog has been the busiest team with 68 moves. @jlouie1588 has the fewest with 12. 314 completed transactions in this league so far.
@FFSnoog
@sullivancole25
It's Going to Be Bad
Kendre's Krusaders
| Team | Total | Trades | Waivers | Free agents |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @FFSnoog | 68 | 32 | 21 | 15 |
| @sullivancole25 | 64 | 38 | 15 | 11 |
| It's Going to Be Bad@thatscheeks | 55 | 30 | 19 | 6 |
| Kendre's Krusaders@BIGDaddyMagz | 52 | 26 | 11 | 15 |
| MVPurdy@PorkchopFF | 41 | 28 | 8 |
Superlatives
The things a rankings table cannot tell you.
Dirty Mike@DirtyMike205
34%
Wins the championship most often across every simulated season.
A TOUCH OF THE CHISM
@FizzleK7
Chemistry
Dirty Mike
No Discount Zone
Jeffrey Epsteam
@jlouie1588
| 5 |
| A TOUCH OF THE CHISM@CrillFFS | 40 | 13 | 14 | 13 |
|---|
| @FizzleK7 | 35 | 14 | 13 | 6 |
|---|
| Chemistry@DDskiii | 35 | 22 | 4 | 9 |
|---|
| Dirty Mike@DirtyMike205 | 32 | 24 | 3 | 5 |
|---|
| No Discount Zone@rochristen78 | 31 | 13 | 7 | 11 |
|---|
| Jeffrey Epsteam@achase1010 | 30 | 25 | 1 | 4 |
|---|
| @jlouie1588 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
|---|
Totals also count moves a commissioner made, which are not broken out here.
MVPurdy@PorkchopFF
100%
Starts the closest thing to its best possible lineup this week.
FFSnoog
37.6 pts
Loses the most projected points to a suboptimal starting lineup.
Dirty Mike@DirtyMike205
+2.1%
Its starters beat their own projections more often than anyone else's.
Jeffrey Epsteam@achase1010
164.4 opp
Faces the strongest set of opponents over the remaining schedule.
Dirty Mike@DirtyMike205
-4%
Loses the least output when a position's best starter goes down.
Chemistry@DDskiii
+9 spots
Competes far better than its trade-value ranking suggests.
Kendre's Krusaders@BIGDaddyMagz
-9 spots
Holds far more trade value than its lineup converts into wins. Tied with 1 other team.
Standings
Expected performance from here, in this league's scoring. Team value with picks, via FF Beacon.
| Rank | Team | Pulse | Outlook | QB | RB | WR | TE | Picks | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 86, 1st of 12 | Contend | 1st, top three | 2nd, top three | 2nd, top three | 6th | 8th | 105,369, 4th in the league by value | |
| 2 | 85, 2nd of 12 | Contend | 7th | 4th | 4th | 5th | 12th, bottom three | 69,620, 11th in the league by value | |
| 3 | 77, 3rd of 12 | Contend | 6th | 5th | 3rd, top three | 10th, bottom three | 6th | 91,523, 7th in the league by value | |
| 4 | 75, 4th of 12 | Contend | 2nd, top three | 7th | 6th | 3rd, top three | 10th, bottom three | 79,929, 10th in the league by value | |
| 5 | 69, 5th of 12 | Bubble | 4th | 3rd, top three | 5th | 7th | 9th | 92,987, 6th in the league by value | |
| 6 | 68, 6th of 12 | Bubble | 3rd, top three | 1st, top three | 9th | 4th | 5th | 105,054, 5th in the league by value | |
| 7 | 56, 7th of 12 | Bubble | 8th | 8th | 1st, top three | 11th, bottom three | 7th | 89,882, 8th in the league by value | |
| 8 | 48, 8th of 12 | Loaded | 5th | 9th | 8th | 2nd, top three | 4th | 111,135, 3rd in the league by value | |
| 9 | 38, 9th of 12 | Rebuild | 11th, bottom three | 6th | 7th | 9th | 11th, bottom three | 62,642, 12th in the league by value | |
| 10 | 14, 10th of 12 | Rebuild | 9th | 11th, bottom three | 10th, bottom three | 1st, top three | 1st, top three | 154,525, 1st in the league by value | |
| 11 | 10, 11th of 12 | Rebuild | 12th, bottom three | 10th, bottom three | 11th, bottom three | 8th | 2nd, top three | 116,303, 2nd in the league by value | |
| 12 | 3, 12th of 12 | Rebuild | 10th, bottom three | 12th, bottom three | 12th, bottom three | 12th, bottom three | 3rd, top three | 88,502, 9th in the league by value |