Send Germie Bernard to Chemistry (@DDskiii) for Mike Evans.
Why this one: You asked for contender deals, so this ranking leads on lineup points and projected wins. Chemistry (@DDskiii) are chasing this season, so what they can spare is the depth behind their starters. Your lineup is short at WR, about 3.9 points a week behind, and this deal lands there.
You get
Mike EvansWide receiver, SF. value 2,058, 18.3 pts/wk, age 33.2
Total value 2,058
You send
Germie BernardWide receiver, PIT. value 2,158, 9.2 pts/wk, age 22.9
Total value 2,158
What it does
- Your lineup
- Your starting lineup: +9.1 points a week
- Projected wins
- Your projected wins, estimated: your season gains about 0.38 of a win over the games you have left
- Your value
- Your trade value: -100 points
- Their lineup
- Their starting lineup: -4.1 points a week
- Value gap
- Value gap between the two sides: 5 percent
Your starting lineup gains +9.1 points a week at WR. Against your remaining schedule that is worth about 0.38 of a projected win. You give up 100 points of trade value to do it.
Chemistry (@DDskiii) reads as a contender chasing this season, so the case has to be the value. They finish 100 points of value ahead.
The message
What do you think of me sending you Germie Bernard, and you sending back Mike Evans? On value it is close to even both ways.