Loading your Sleeper league.
League Pulse
Dynasty Standard
Roster
Scoring
Last updated 28 minutes ago (served from cache),values via FF Beacon, Dynasty PPR 1QB
Showing values for Dynasty PPR 1QB because FF Beacon doesn't publish data for Dynasty Standard. Pick a different source from the site header to find a closer match.
Loading filters
Loading transactions
Refine
The feed opens on trades. Uncheck every type to see waivers and free agent moves too.
Feed
35 trades. Graded by Signal Check using FF Beacon values in Dynasty PPR 1QB.
This league looks like Dynasty Standard, which FF Beacon does not publish its own values for yet. Trades are graded with the closest supported format, Dynasty PPR 1QB, so a few values may be slightly off.
Trade graded by Signal Check
Beacon Verdict
29.2%
value margin
Value balance
Falco's Phyxius holds about 35 percent of the trade value and WHO DAT holds about 65 percent. WHO DAT is favored.
Trade graded by Signal Check
Beacon Verdict
34.4%
value margin
Trade graded by Signal Check
Beacon Verdict
10.3%
value margin
Trade graded by Signal Check
Beacon Verdict
14.5%
value margin
Trade graded by Signal Check
Beacon Verdict
13%
value margin
Trade graded by Signal Check
Beacon Verdict
27.3%
value margin
Trade graded by Signal Check
Beacon Verdict
8.5%
value margin
Trade graded by Signal Check
Beacon Verdict
11.1%
value margin
@Buccaneer198
Total value received, 0 points
Acquired
ATL@JiffyJeff44
Total value received,
2026 startup draft trade graded by Signal Check
Beacon Verdict
2026 startup draft trade graded by Signal Check
Beacon Verdict
2026 startup draft trade graded by Signal Check
Beacon Verdict
Trade graded by Signal Check
Beacon Verdict
11.1%
value margin
2026 startup draft trade graded by Signal Check
Beacon Verdict
2026 startup draft trade graded by Signal Check
Beacon Verdict
2026 startup draft trade graded by Signal Check
Beacon Verdict
2026 startup draft trade graded by Signal Check
Beacon Verdict
2026 startup draft trade graded by Signal Check
Beacon Verdict
2026 startup draft trade graded by Signal Check
Beacon Verdict
2026 startup draft trade graded by Signal Check
Beacon Verdict
2026 startup draft trade graded by Signal Check
Beacon Verdict
2026 startup draft trade graded by Signal Check
Beacon Verdict
2026 startup draft trade graded by Signal Check
Beacon Verdict
2026 startup draft trade graded by Signal Check
Beacon Verdict
2026 startup draft trade graded by Signal Check
Beacon Verdict
Receives
Receives
The read
Side B wins by 29.2% of total trade value. Side B receives the strongest individual asset in the deal. Side B carries the more concentrated package, so the smaller pieces on the other side, the ones worth under half the best asset in the deal, count for less than their face value. The deal grades as a win-now move.
How close
This is a lopsided trade by value. One side is getting a lot more than the other.
Sleeper does not say where a traded pick will land, so a pick here is slotted from the projected regular season finish of the team it came from: the top third of the standings sends late picks, the middle third mid, the bottom third early. A pick a season beyond the last finish we can project reuses that finish. It moves as the projection moves.
Value balance
WHO DAT holds about 67 percent of the trade value and SCLSU Mud Dogs holds about 33 percent. WHO DAT is favored.
Receives
Receives
The read
Side A wins by 34.4% of total trade value. Side A receives the strongest individual asset in the deal. Side A carries the more concentrated package, so the smaller pieces on the other side, the ones worth under half the best asset in the deal, count for less than their face value. The deal grades as a win-now move.
How close
This is a lopsided trade by value. One side is getting a lot more than the other.
Sleeper does not say where a traded pick will land, so a pick here is slotted from the projected regular season finish of the team it came from: the top third of the standings sends late picks, the middle third mid, the bottom third early. A pick a season beyond the last finish we can project reuses that finish. It moves as the projection moves.
Value balance
Appetite 4 Deuce-Truction holds about 55 percent of the trade value and SCLSU Mud Dogs holds about 45 percent. Appetite 4 Deuce-Truction is favored.
Receives
Receives
The read
Side A wins by 10.3% of total trade value. Side A receives the strongest individual asset in the deal. The deal grades as a stud-for-stud swap.
How close
One side comes out ahead, but the gap is not huge. Team needs could still tip the scales.
Value balance
Falco's Phyxius holds about 43 percent of the trade value and SCLSU Mud Dogs holds about 57 percent. SCLSU Mud Dogs is favored.
Receives
Receives
The read
Side B wins by 14.5% of total trade value. Side B receives the strongest individual asset in the deal. Side B carries the more concentrated package, so the smaller pieces on the other side, the ones worth under half the best asset in the deal, count for less than their face value. The deal grades as a roster clog risk.
How close
One side comes out ahead, but the gap is not huge. Team needs could still tip the scales.
Sleeper does not say where a traded pick will land, so a pick here is slotted from the projected regular season finish of the team it came from: the top third of the standings sends late picks, the middle third mid, the bottom third early. A pick a season beyond the last finish we can project reuses that finish. It moves as the projection moves.
Value balance
Appetite 4 Deuce-Truction holds about 56 percent of the trade value and Kingsmen13 holds about 44 percent. Appetite 4 Deuce-Truction is favored.
Receives
Receives
The read
Side A wins by 13% of total trade value. Side A receives the strongest individual asset in the deal. Side A carries the more concentrated package, so the smaller pieces on the other side, the ones worth under half the best asset in the deal, count for less than their face value.
How close
One side comes out ahead, but the gap is not huge. Team needs could still tip the scales.
Value balance
The Shock Doctrine holds about 36 percent of the trade value and Oinkers holds about 64 percent. Oinkers is favored.
Receives
Receives
The read
Side B wins by 27.3% of total trade value. Side B receives the strongest individual asset in the deal. The deal grades as a stud-for-stud swap.
How close
This is a lopsided trade by value. One side is getting a lot more than the other.
Value balance
Oinkers holds about 54 percent of the trade value and Afghanistan Aggies holds about 46 percent. Oinkers is favored.
Receives
Receives
The read
Side A wins by 8.5% of total trade value. Side A receives the strongest individual asset in the deal. The deal grades as a stud-for-stud swap.
How close
One side comes out ahead, but the gap is not huge. Team needs could still tip the scales.
Value balance
SCLSU Mud Dogs holds about 44 percent of the trade value and Afghanistan Aggies holds about 56 percent. Afghanistan Aggies is favored.
Receives
Receives
The read
Side B wins by 11.1% of total trade value. Side B receives the strongest individual asset in the deal. Side B carries the more concentrated package, so the smaller pieces on the other side, the ones worth under half the best asset in the deal, count for less than their face value. The deal grades as a win-now move.
How close
One side comes out ahead, but the gap is not huge. Team needs could still tip the scales.
Sleeper does not say where a traded pick will land, so a pick here is slotted from the projected regular season finish of the team it came from: the top third of the standings sends late picks, the middle third mid, the bottom third early. A pick a season beyond the last finish we can project reuses that finish. It moves as the projection moves.
Acquired
CINVerdict: Even trade
Values via FF Beacon, Dynasty PPR 1QB
Some assets in this trade lack value data; differential may be incomplete.
20.5%
value margin
Value balance
The Mighty Bella holds about 60 percent of the trade value and Wedgebrrakers holds about 40 percent. The Mighty Bella is favored.
Receives
Receives
The read
Side A wins by 20.5% of total trade value. Side A receives the strongest individual asset in the deal. The deal grades as a stud-for-stud swap.
How close
This is a lopsided trade by value. One side is getting a lot more than the other.
One pick in this trade is valued as the player actually drafted with it. Values are current, so this reads how the deal looks now rather than on the day.
24.9%
value margin
Value balance
Appetite 4 Deuce-Truction holds about 62 percent of the trade value and Oinkers holds about 38 percent. Appetite 4 Deuce-Truction is favored.
Receives
Receives
The read
Side A wins by 24.9% of total trade value. Side A receives the strongest individual asset in the deal. The deal grades as a stud-for-stud swap.
How close
This is a lopsided trade by value. One side is getting a lot more than the other.
One pick in this trade is valued as the player actually drafted with it. Values are current, so this reads how the deal looks now rather than on the day.
29.1%
value margin
Value balance
WHO DAT holds about 65 percent of the trade value and SCLSU Mud Dogs holds about 35 percent. WHO DAT is favored.
Receives
Receives
The read
Side A wins by 29.1% of total trade value. Side A receives the strongest individual asset in the deal. The deal grades as a roster clog risk.
How close
This is a lopsided trade by value. One side is getting a lot more than the other.
5 picks in this trade are valued as the players actually drafted with them. Values are current, so this reads how the deal looks now rather than on the day.
Sleeper does not say where a traded pick will land, so a pick here is slotted from the projected regular season finish of the team it came from: the top third of the standings sends late picks, the middle third mid, the bottom third early. A pick a season beyond the last finish we can project reuses that finish. It moves as the projection moves.
Value balance
SCLSU Mud Dogs holds about 56 percent of the trade value and Afghanistan Aggies holds about 44 percent. SCLSU Mud Dogs is favored.
Receives
Receives
The read
Side A wins by 11.1% of total trade value. Side A receives the strongest individual asset in the deal. The deal grades as a pick-heavy deal.
How close
One side comes out ahead, but the gap is not huge. Team needs could still tip the scales.
Sleeper does not say where a traded pick will land, so a pick here is slotted from the projected regular season finish of the team it came from: the top third of the standings sends late picks, the middle third mid, the bottom third early. A pick a season beyond the last finish we can project reuses that finish. It moves as the projection moves.
27.2%
value margin
Value balance
Appetite 4 Deuce-Truction holds about 64 percent of the trade value and Afghanistan Aggies holds about 36 percent. Appetite 4 Deuce-Truction is favored.
Receives
Receives
The read
Side A wins by 27.2% of total trade value. Side A receives the strongest individual asset in the deal. Side A carries the more concentrated package, so the smaller pieces on the other side, the ones worth under half the best asset in the deal, count for less than their face value. The deal grades as a consolidation trade.
How close
This is a lopsided trade by value. One side is getting a lot more than the other.
3 picks in this trade are valued as the players actually drafted with them. Values are current, so this reads how the deal looks now rather than on the day.
4.4%
value margin
Value balance
WHO DAT holds about 52 percent of the trade value and Wedgebrrakers holds about 48 percent. WHO DAT is favored.
Receives
Receives
The read
Side A wins by 4.4% of total trade value. Side A receives the strongest individual asset in the deal. Side A carries the more concentrated package, so the smaller pieces on the other side, the ones worth under half the best asset in the deal, count for less than their face value.
How close
One side comes out ahead, but the gap is not huge. Team needs could still tip the scales.
One pick in this trade is valued as the player actually drafted with it. Values are current, so this reads how the deal looks now rather than on the day.
23.7%
value margin
Value balance
Appetite 4 Deuce-Truction holds about 38 percent of the trade value and Pinya holds about 62 percent. Pinya is favored.
Receives
Receives
The read
Side B wins by 23.7% of total trade value. Side B receives the strongest individual asset in the deal. Side B carries the more concentrated package, so the smaller pieces on the other side, the ones worth under half the best asset in the deal, count for less than their face value. The deal grades as a consolidation trade.
How close
This is a lopsided trade by value. One side is getting a lot more than the other.
3 picks in this trade are valued as the players actually drafted with them. Values are current, so this reads how the deal looks now rather than on the day.
28.9%
value margin
Value balance
Falco's Phyxius holds about 36 percent of the trade value and SCLSU Mud Dogs holds about 64 percent. SCLSU Mud Dogs is favored.
Receives
Receives
The read
Side B wins by 28.9% of total trade value. Side B receives the strongest individual asset in the deal. Side B carries the more concentrated package, so the smaller pieces on the other side, the ones worth under half the best asset in the deal, count for less than their face value. The deal grades as a roster clog risk.
How close
This is a lopsided trade by value. One side is getting a lot more than the other.
3 picks in this trade are valued as the players actually drafted with them. Values are current, so this reads how the deal looks now rather than on the day.
71.2%
value margin
Value balance
Appetite 4 Deuce-Truction holds about 14 percent of the trade value and SCLSU Mud Dogs holds about 86 percent. SCLSU Mud Dogs is favored.
Receives
Receives
The read
Side B wins by 71.2% of total trade value. Side B receives the strongest individual asset in the deal. Side B carries the more concentrated package, so the smaller pieces on the other side, the ones worth under half the best asset in the deal, count for less than their face value. The deal grades as a consolidation trade.
How close
This is a lopsided trade by value. One side is getting a lot more than the other.
2 picks in this trade are valued as the players actually drafted with them. Values are current, so this reads how the deal looks now rather than on the day.
37.2%
value margin
Value balance
Appetite 4 Deuce-Truction holds about 31 percent of the trade value and SCLSU Mud Dogs holds about 69 percent. SCLSU Mud Dogs is favored.
Receives
Receives
The read
Side B wins by 37.2% of total trade value. Side B receives the strongest individual asset in the deal.
How close
This is a lopsided trade by value. One side is getting a lot more than the other.
2 picks in this trade are valued as the players actually drafted with them. Values are current, so this reads how the deal looks now rather than on the day.
70.3%
value margin
Value balance
Appetite 4 Deuce-Truction holds about 15 percent of the trade value and SCLSU Mud Dogs holds about 85 percent. SCLSU Mud Dogs is favored.
Receives
Receives
The read
Side B wins by 70.3% of total trade value. Side B receives the strongest individual asset in the deal. The deal grades as a consolidation trade.
How close
This is a lopsided trade by value. One side is getting a lot more than the other.
One pick in this trade is valued as the player actually drafted with it. Values are current, so this reads how the deal looks now rather than on the day.
14.6%
value margin
Value balance
SCLSU Mud Dogs holds about 43 percent of the trade value and Afghanistan Aggies holds about 57 percent. Afghanistan Aggies is favored.
Receives
Receives
The read
Side B wins by 14.6% of total trade value. The deal grades as a consolidation trade.
How close
One side comes out ahead, but the gap is not huge. Team needs could still tip the scales.
3 picks in this trade are valued as the players actually drafted with them. Values are current, so this reads how the deal looks now rather than on the day.
22.5%
value margin
Value balance
Appetite 4 Deuce-Truction holds about 39 percent of the trade value and Oinkers holds about 61 percent. Oinkers is favored.
Receives
Receives
The read
Side B wins by 22.5% of total trade value. The deal grades as a consolidation trade.
How close
This is a lopsided trade by value. One side is getting a lot more than the other.
2 picks in this trade are valued as the players actually drafted with them. Values are current, so this reads how the deal looks now rather than on the day.
26.1%
value margin
Value balance
Appetite 4 Deuce-Truction holds about 63 percent of the trade value and The Mighty Bella holds about 37 percent. Appetite 4 Deuce-Truction is favored.
Receives
Receives
The read
Side A wins by 26.1% of total trade value. The deal grades as a consolidation trade.
How close
This is a lopsided trade by value. One side is getting a lot more than the other.
2 picks in this trade are valued as the players actually drafted with them. Values are current, so this reads how the deal looks now rather than on the day.
30.6%
value margin
Value balance
Appetite 4 Deuce-Truction holds about 35 percent of the trade value and WHO DAT holds about 65 percent. WHO DAT is favored.
Receives
Receives
The read
Side B wins by 30.6% of total trade value. Side B receives the strongest individual asset in the deal.
How close
This is a lopsided trade by value. One side is getting a lot more than the other.
2 picks in this trade are valued as the players actually drafted with them. Values are current, so this reads how the deal looks now rather than on the day.
17.8%
value margin
Value balance
WHO DAT holds about 41 percent of the trade value and Afghanistan Aggies holds about 59 percent. Afghanistan Aggies is favored.
Receives
Receives
The read
Side B wins by 17.8% of total trade value. Side B receives the strongest individual asset in the deal. Side B carries the more concentrated package, so the smaller pieces on the other side, the ones worth under half the best asset in the deal, count for less than their face value. The deal grades as a consolidation trade.
How close
One side comes out ahead, but the gap is not huge. Team needs could still tip the scales.
2 picks in this trade are valued as the players actually drafted with them. Values are current, so this reads how the deal looks now rather than on the day.
