Send Carnell Tate to On to 2026 (@m3atB3ater) for J.K. Dobbins and Bucky Irving.
Why this one: You asked for value deals, so this ranking leads on what the pieces are worth. On to 2026 (@m3atB3ater) have no strong pull either way, which is the kind of team that tends to answer. Your lineup is short at RB, about 13.8 points a week behind, and this deal lands there.
You get
J.K. DobbinsRunning back, DEN. value 1,251, 11.0 pts/wk, age 27.9
Bucky IrvingRunning back, TB. value 3,867, 20.2 pts/wk, age 24.2
Total value 5,118
You send
Carnell TateWide receiver, TEN. value 4,393, 14.2 pts/wk, age 21.8
Total value 4,393
What it does
- Your lineup
- Your starting lineup: +16.5 points a week
- Projected wins
- Your projected wins, estimated: your season gains about 0.84 of a win over the games you have left
- Your value
- Your trade value: +725 points
- Their lineup
- Their starting lineup: -6.0 points a week
- Value gap
- Value gap between the two sides: 14 percent
Your starting lineup gains +16.5 points a week at RB. Against your remaining schedule that is worth about 0.84 of a projected win. You come out 725 points of trade value ahead.
On to 2026 (@m3atB3ater) reads as a bubble team in the middle of the pack, with no strong pull either way. They take on 725 points less value than they send.
Worth knowing
- You take back 1 more player than you send, so you may need to drop somebody.
The message
What do you think of me sending you Carnell Tate, and you sending back J.K. Dobbins and Bucky Irving?