Worth asking
Send Caleb Williams to @Corrumpt for Brock Purdy.
Why this one: This is a one-year league, so the ranking is about what a deal does to your lineup rather than what an asset holds for later. @Corrumpt are chasing this season, so what they can spare is the depth behind their starters.
You get
Brock PurdyQuarterback, SF. value 5,934, 27.7 pts/wk, age 26.8
Total value 5,934
You send
Caleb WilliamsQuarterback, CHI. value 5,983, 21.2 pts/wk, age 24.9
Total value 5,983
What it does
- Your lineup
- Your starting lineup: +6.6 points a week
- Projected wins
- Your projected wins, estimated: your season gains about 0.43 of a win over the games you have left
- Your value
- Your trade value: -49 points
- Their lineup
- Their starting lineup: -6.6 points a week
- Value gap
- Value gap between the two sides: 1 percent
Your starting lineup gains +6.6 points a week. Against your remaining schedule that is worth about 0.43 of a projected win. You give up 49 points of trade value to do it.
@Corrumpt reads as a bubble team chasing this season, so the case has to be the value. They finish 49 points of value ahead.
The message
What do you think of me sending you Caleb Williams, and you sending back Brock Purdy? On value it is close to even both ways.