Loading your Sleeper league.
Loading your Sleeper league.
League Pulse
Redraft PPR
Roster
Scoring
Last updated 38 minutes ago (served from cache),values via FF Beacon, Redraft 1QB PPR
Good, lucky, or carried
Every other page here grades your roster. This one grades what you did with it.
Lineups, waivers, trades and draft picks, all from finished weeks and real points. The highest-scoring team in the league can still finish last here.
Grading this league
39
Losses across 12 teams that the loser's own bench would have won, in 18 finished weeks.
3529.9
Every point left on a bench in this league, added up.
88%
What the average manager here started, out of what they had.
Standouts
An award only shows up when someone has earned it.
The School Board@BowtieBotzki
93%
Started more of their own roster's points than anyone.
Joe buck yourself@Mleone
391.5
Points left on the bench, 21.7 a week.
The leaderboard
18 finished weeks of 2024. Ordered by the share of their own points each manager started.
| Rank | Team | Started | Left behind | Record | Best lineup | Wins left | Points rank | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The School Board@BowtieBotzki | 93% | 155.28.6 per week | 10-7 | 11-6 | 1 game lost that the bench would have won | 3 of 12 on points scored2 places better on decisions than on points | |
| 2 |  PAC Watch@xcolinflanaganx | 89% | 246.213.7 per week | 9-8 | 11-6 | 2 games lost that the bench would have won | 9 of 12 on points scored7 places better on decisions than on points | |
| 3 |  The Coconut King@kaimeade | 89% | 260.114.5 per week | 5-11 | 9-7 | 4 games lost that the bench would have won | 4 of 12 on points scored1 place better on decisions than on points | |
| 4 | Sloppy Toppenheimer@samklein03 | 89% | 241.813.4 per week | 8-8 | 10-6 | 2 games lost that the bench would have won | 10 of 12 on points scored6 places better on decisions than on points | |
| 5 |  Marcy Kracker@natsgnats | 89% | 261.214.5 per week | 9-7 | 12-4 | 3 games lost that the bench would have won | 8 of 12 on points scored3 places better on decisions than on points | |
| 6 |  The Big Hosses@hcmccr8 | 88% | 279.515.5 per week | 9-7 | 12-4 | 3 games lost that the bench would have won | 6 of 12 on points scoredthe same rank on decisions as on points | |
| 7 | @crispytoast9 | 88% | 287.716.0 per week | 6-11 | 13-4 | 7 games lost that the bench would have won | 5 of 12 on points scored2 places worse on decisions than on points | |
| 8 |  A Very Demure Team 🧚🏻♀️@MeggieL20 | 86% | 353.719.6 per week | 10-6 | 12-4 | 2 games lost that the bench would have won | 2 of 12 on points scored6 places worse on decisions than on points | |
| 9 | Joe buck yourself@Mleone | 86% | 391.521.7 per week | 12-4 | 15-1 | 3 games lost that the bench would have won | 1 of 12 on points scored8 places worse on decisions than on points | |
| 10 |  The Boogeymen@DanCrowder | 86% | 331.718.4 per week | 7-10 | 11-6 | 4 games lost that the bench would have won | 11 of 12 on points scored1 place better on decisions than on points | |
| 11 | Generalissimo Allen’s Men@JoshK73 | 85% | 379.221.1 per week | 9-7 | 14-2 | 5 games lost that the bench would have won | 7 of 12 on points scored4 places worse on decisions than on points | |
| 12 |  Big Justice League@KaufmanHive | 83% | 342.319.0 per week | 4-12 | 7-9 | 3 games lost that the bench would have won | 12 of 12 on points scoredthe same rank on decisions as on points | |
Everything here has already happened. It covers weeks 1 to 18, and it uses the points every player really scored, bench included. Nothing on this page is a projection.
Started. How much of what you could have scored you actually put in your lineup. The comparison is the best lineup your own players could have made that week, filled the way your league's rules allow.
Wins left behind. Losses where that best lineup would have beaten your opponent's real score. Their bench is left alone: you cannot set someone else's lineup.
Waivers count what each pickup scored in your lineup afterward. Trades count what came in against what the players you sent scored elsewhere. Draft compares each pick to the average pick in the same round of the same draft. Keepers are left out.
A player you drafted and later traded still counts on your draft. Picking him and trading him are two different decisions with two different ledgers.
Only players you could have started. Anyone on IR or the taxi squad is left out of the best lineup. Those lists are today's, since Sleeper keeps no week by week history, but anyone who actually started a week always counts for that week.
Two things this cannot price. Draft picks traded away score no points, so they are in no total, and a trade that moved them says so. And you are only measured against players you already had: getting the roster is a different job from running it, which is why the points rank sits beside the decisions rank instead of inside it.
@crispytoast9
7
Losses their own bench would have won.
PAC Watch@xcolinflanaganx
927.7
Points started from 31 pickups. 23 made the lineup.
Sloppy Toppenheimer@samklein03
+130.7
Points in minus points out over 1 trade.
Joe buck yourself@Mleone
+520.8
Points above what the room took in the same rounds, over 15 picks.
PAC Watch@xcolinflanaganx
9 to 2
9th of 12 on points, 2nd on decisions. Squeezing a lot out of a little.
Joe buck yourself@Mleone
1 to 9
1st of 12 on points, 9th on decisions. The roster is doing the work.
Joe buck yourself has left the most behind: 391.5 points, 21.7 a week. Open a manager for their full season.