Mike Evans or Garrett Wilson?
Start Mike Evans. Evans projects 0.0 points clear of Garrett Wilson in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Wilson.
Mike Evans
StartTools
Working out who to start.
Week 2
Real Week 2 comparisons with the verdict already worked out. Open any of them on the board for the full breakdown.
Start Mike Evans. Evans projects 0.0 points clear of Garrett Wilson in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Wilson.
Mike Evans
StartThe method
It starts with a weekly point projection from Sleeper, rescored under the format set in the site header rather than left in one generic scoring. That single adjustment is why a TE premium league or a superflex league can see a different lean than a standard league for the same two players.
Still not sure?
The confidence figure gives you a clear lean, but a close start/sit call can stay close. Bring it to our Discord and real fantasy managers will help you settle it for free. Want to know what's behind FF Beacon? Read about the project.
WR
SF
14.0 projected points
Garrett Wilson
SitWR
NYJ
14.0 projected points
Start Parker Washington. Washington projects 0.0 points clear of Rome Odunze in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Odunze.
Parker Washington
StartWR
JAX
10.3 projected points
Rome Odunze
SitWR
CHI
10.3 projected points
Start Ka'imi Fairbairn. Fairbairn projects 0.0 points clear of Brandon Aubrey in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Aubrey.
Ka'imi Fairbairn
StartK
HOU
7.6 projected points
Brandon Aubrey
SitK
DAL
7.6 projected points
Start Emeka Egbuka. Egbuka projects 0.0 points clear of Chris Godwin in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Godwin.
Emeka Egbuka
StartWR
TB
11.2 projected points
Chris Godwin
SitWR
TB
11.2 projected points
Start Chris Olave. Olave projects 0.0 points clear of Zay Flowers in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Flowers.
Chris Olave
StartWR
NO
16.0 projected points
Zay Flowers
SitWR
BAL
16.0 projected points
Start Jalen Hurts. Hurts projects 0.0 points clear of Jayden Daniels in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Daniels.
Jalen Hurts
StartQB
PHI
21.9 projected points
Jayden Daniels
SitQB
WAS
21.9 projected points
Start Jadarian Price. Price projects 0.0 points clear of Rhamondre Stevenson in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Stevenson.
Jadarian Price
StartRB
SEA
11.7 projected points
Rhamondre Stevenson
SitRB
NE
11.6 projected points
Start Ladd McConkey. McConkey projects 0.0 points clear of Davante Adams in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Adams.
Ladd McConkey
StartWR
LAC
12.4 projected points
Davante Adams
SitWR
LAR
12.3 projected points
Start Josh Allen. Allen projects 0.0 points clear of Brock Purdy in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Purdy.
Josh Allen
StartQB
BUF
21.4 projected points
Brock Purdy
SitQB
SF
21.3 projected points
Start Brian Thomas. Thomas projects 0.0 points clear of Marvin Harrison in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Harrison.
Brian Thomas
StartWR
JAX
9.2 projected points
Marvin Harrison
SitWR
ARI
9.2 projected points
Start Kyle Pitts. Pitts projects 0.1 points clear of Dallas Goedert in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Goedert.
Kyle Pitts
StartTE
ATL
10.8 projected points
Dallas Goedert
SitTE
PHI
10.8 projected points
Start Indianapolis Colts. Colts projects 0.1 points clear of Cleveland Browns in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Browns.
Indianapolis Colts
StartDEF
IND
5.2 projected points
Cleveland Browns
SitDEF
CLE
5.1 projected points
Next comes the matchup: how many fantasy points the opposing defense has allowed to that position, measured from our own player-by-player results rather than taken from the projection source, and adjusted for the strength of the offenses that defense actually faced. It blends the two most recent seasons of games actually played, weighting the more recent one heavier.
Then a reliability discount: how often the player has actually beaten the player's own projection in games graded so far this season, and how often the player has been available to play at all. A boom-or-bust player gets pulled back toward the field; a steady one keeps more of that projected number.
Finally, the confidence figure: the probability that the player you are told to start actually outscores the closest player left on the bench, built from the same win-probability math the League Pulse schedule board uses to grade a matchup.
Projections and injury designations refresh once a day; the timestamp above the board is the exact time the numbers you are looking at were last pulled.
Scoring formats
The format chip at the top of the board follows whatever you have set in the site header, and every player's projection is repriced under that scoring rather than shown once in a single format. PPR and half PPR change how much a high-target pass catcher is worth next to a workhorse runner; standard drops the reception bonus entirely and shifts the whole board toward touchdowns and yardage.
TE premium and superflex are treated as real formats here, not a checkbox bolted onto a PPR number, because both change who the better start actually is. For a deeper look at where a player ranks under your own scoring, see the full Redraft 1QB PPR rankings board or browse rankings for every format we support.
Your board is set to
Redraft 1QB PPR
Change it from the format control in the site header.
Volume decides most quarterback weeks before the matchup does. A quarterback who throws forty times and adds rushing work on top can outscore a tougher matchup through pure opportunity, which is why the projection starts from expected attempts and carries, not from a single highlight-worthy throw. After volume, the tool weighs the matchup: how many points the opposing defense has allowed to the position, adjusted for the offenses that defense actually faced. Game environment matters too. A quarterback expected to trail throws more; one expected to lead runs the clock out and throws less. Rushing floor is usually what separates two similar passers when their passing numbers project close together.
Start Jalen Hurts. Hurts projects 0.0 points clear of Jayden Daniels in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Daniels.
Full breakdown: Hurts vs DanielsTarget share moves a wide receiver's projection more than any other number, because a receiver who sees the ball ten times a game keeps a real floor even on a week the catches go for short gains. After volume, the tool looks at the matchup a receiver actually draws, the gap between a shadow cornerback and a zone look, folded into the defense's points allowed to the position rather than guessed at separately. Game script cuts the other way from running backs: a team expected to trail throws more, which lifts every pass catcher on the roster, including one who would otherwise look like the week's riskier option.
Target share does the most work at tight end, because touchdown-dependent, boom-or-bust production is what separates a usable weekly starter from a name a reader only half recognizes. The tool leans on route participation and red-zone role ahead of raw catch totals, since a tight end on the field for every pass play keeps a real floor even in a game that never turns into a shootout. Matchup still counts, particularly against a defense that struggles to cover the position out of its base personnel, but the gap between replacement level and the position's best players is unusually wide, so role tends to beat matchup more often here than it does at wide receiver.
A flex spot compares players across positions directly on projected points, which is exactly what this tool does: whichever player projects to score more, once matchup, role, and reliability are folded in, is the better start regardless of position. A running back's weekly floor usually comes from touches guaranteed regardless of how the game unfolds, while a receiver's ceiling usually comes from a matchup or a script that favors the pass, so the flex call is often a trade-off between the two rather than a clear edge for either position. When the projections sit close together, the confidence figure and the reliability numbers are the tiebreaker worth trusting over raw upside.
In order
Start with the projection: it already accounts for volume, role, and game script, so it beats a gut feeling about a name you recognize.
Weigh the matchup next, favorable or tough, but treat it as a nudge on a close projection rather than a reason to overturn a clear one.
If your team is favored, lean toward the safer floor between two similar options; if you are the underdog, lean toward the higher ceiling, since a spot start is worth more when you are chasing points than when you are protecting a lead.
Check injury status and weather last, after the numbers, since a limited practice designation or a wind forecast only matters once you know which players were close to begin with.
Never bench a clearly better player over a tough matchup alone; a stud facing a hard matchup is still usually a better start than a replacement-level player facing an easy one.
FAQ
Comparing up to 8 players at once is built into the board above; nothing here requires an account.
Yes. Add up to 8 players to one board and set how many of them you plan to start. The tool ranks the whole group and shows where the close calls sit, alongside the top pick.
It reprices every player under the format set in the site header, including PPR, half PPR, standard, TE premium, and superflex. Connect a Sleeper league from the board and the verdict switches to that league's own literal scoring rules instead of a generic format.
It is the probability that the player you are told to start actually outscores the closest player left on your bench, built from each player's projected points and how much those points tend to vary week to week. A figure near 50 percent means the call is close; one near 100 percent means it is not.
Projections and injury designations refresh once a day. The timestamp shown above the board is the exact time the numbers below it were last pulled.
Yes. Running a comparison costs nothing and does not require an account.
A ranking is a rest-of-season opinion; this verdict is for one week only. A player can sit ahead of another for the rest of the year and still be the worse start in a single week with a tougher matchup or a bye.
Whichever one this tool ranks higher for the week you are setting. Points are compared directly across positions here, which is exactly what a flex decision calls for, and the higher-ranked player is the better start regardless of position.
League Pulse
This tool answers one question at a time: of the players you put in, which ones to start. League Pulse answers a bigger one, your whole starting lineup for the week, filled from your actual Sleeper roster under your league's real scoring.
Start Josh Allen. Allen projects 0.0 points clear of Brock Purdy in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Purdy.
Put Allen and Purdy on the boardStart Caleb Williams. Williams projects 0.1 points clear of Patrick Mahomes in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Mahomes.
Check Williams against MahomesWorkload settles most running back decisions. Carries plus targets, not yards per carry, is the strongest predictor of a week's points, so the tool weighs a back's expected touch share ahead of anything about breakaway speed. Matchup counts for less here than reputation suggests: a defense that is stout against the run can still give up a pile of points through the passing game, so a back who catches passes keeps a real floor even against a tough front. Goal-line and short-yardage role adds touchdown equity a pure yardage projection misses, which is why work inside the ten is tracked as its own input rather than folded into one blended rate.
Start Jadarian Price. Price projects 0.0 points clear of Rhamondre Stevenson in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Stevenson.
Full breakdown: Price vs StevensonStart Javonte Williams. Williams projects 0.1 points clear of Chase Brown in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Brown.
Put Williams and Brown on the boardStart Chase Brown. Brown projects 0.1 points clear of Kenneth Walker in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Walker.
Check Brown against WalkerStart Mike Evans. Evans projects 0.0 points clear of Garrett Wilson in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Wilson.
Full breakdown: Evans vs WilsonStart Parker Washington. Washington projects 0.0 points clear of Rome Odunze in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Odunze.
Put Washington and Odunze on the boardStart Emeka Egbuka. Egbuka projects 0.0 points clear of Chris Godwin in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Godwin.
Check Egbuka against GodwinStart Kyle Pitts. Pitts projects 0.1 points clear of Dallas Goedert in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Goedert.
Full breakdown: Pitts vs GoedertStart George Kittle. Kittle projects 0.1 points clear of Colston Loveland in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Loveland.
Put Kittle and Loveland on the boardStart Dallas Goedert. Goedert projects 0.1 points clear of Sam LaPorta in Redraft 1QB PPR, 51 percent to outscore LaPorta.
Check Goedert against LaPortaDefense and kicker both live and die by game script more than most positions. A defense's points lean heavily on takeaways and touchdowns, among the least predictable events in football, so the matchup, an opponent's turnover rate and offensive line quality, carries more weight here than for an offensive skill position. A kicker's floor is field goal volume, which rises in a game expected to stall in the red zone and falls in one expected to end in touchdowns, so the same game-environment signal that lowers a kicker's outlook often raises the defense's. Both are the most matchup-driven calls on the board and worth checking against the week's projected team totals.
Start Ka'imi Fairbairn. Fairbairn projects 0.0 points clear of Brandon Aubrey in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Aubrey.
Full breakdown: Fairbairn vs AubreyStart Indianapolis Colts. Colts projects 0.1 points clear of Cleveland Browns in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Browns.
Put Colts and Browns on the boardStart Cam Little. Little projects 0.0 points clear of Jake Bates in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Bates.
Check Little against BatesWeek 2, 2026. Projections updated Sep 11, 2026, 8:00 AM EDT.
The verdict
Start Parker Washington. Washington projects 0.0 points clear of Rome Odunze in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Odunze.
A horizontally scrolling row of 2 player cards, starters first. Use the "Show as a list" button above to read them stacked instead.
Start this player
WR
JAX
opponent (DEN)
Projected points
Redraft 1QB PPR10.3
Floor 0.4,Ceiling 20.3
Matchup
Sit this player
WR
CHI
opponent (MIN)
Projected points
Redraft 1QB PPR10.3
Start this player
WR
JAX
opponent (DEN)
Projected points
Redraft 1QB PPR10.3
Each range bar runs from floor to ceiling on one shared scale, 0 to 25 points, so the bars compare across cards.
Value is the player's trade price. This week's points are the projection above.
Win probability: Parker Washington 50 percent, Rome Odunze 50 percent. The two teams are close to even.
Connect a Sleeper league and we will score every player under your league's own rules, then work out how many points each one really adds to your starting lineup.
Same numbers, weighted for the question you are asking.
The next game only: projection, matchup, and whether he is healthy.
Beacon Edge
Weighted for long-term value, age, and market signal
Parker Washington holds a slight edge on the Beacon Edge, averaged over 15 scored categories weighted for long-term value, age, and market signal. Ranked by composite: Parker Washington 53%, Rome Odunze 47%.
Averaged across 15 scored categories. The table below shows exactly which players and categories moved it.
Every player's share of the weighted average, ranked.
Parker Washington holds a slight edge on the Beacon Edge, averaged over 15 scored categories weighted for long-term value, age, and market signal. Ranked by composite: Parker Washington 53%, Rome Odunze 47%.
Game environment
Beat rate
64%
Availability
100%
Recent form
Not enough graded weeks to chart yet.
Value (FF Beacon)
3,970
Overall rank
#68
Floor 2.0,Ceiling 18.7
Matchup
Game environment
Beat rate
46%
Availability
100%
Recent form
Not enough graded weeks to chart yet.
Questionable
Value (FF Beacon)
3,888
Overall rank
#71
Floor 0.4,Ceiling 20.3
Matchup
Game environment
Beat rate
64%
Availability
100%
Recent form
Not enough graded weeks to chart yet.
Value (FF Beacon)
3,970
Overall rank
#68
Sit this player
WR
CHI
opponent (MIN)
Projected points
Redraft 1QB PPR10.3
Floor 2.0,Ceiling 18.7
Matchup
Game environment
Beat rate
46%
Availability
100%
Recent form
Not enough graded weeks to chart yet.
Questionable
Value (FF Beacon)
3,888
Overall rank
#71
| Player | Composite |
|---|---|
| Parker Washington (leader) | 53% |
| Rome Odunze | 47% |
Each bar is how far that category moved the meter, in percentage points. They add up to the split above.
Each category's pull toward Parker Washington or Rome Odunze, in percentage points. Totals: Parker Washington 2.3 points, Rome Odunze 0.0 points, for a final split of 53 to 47.
Upside
Weighted at 10% of this lens
Upside: favors Parker Washington by 1.2 percentage points, carrying 10 percent of the weight.
30-Day Trend
Weighted at 7% of this lens
30-Day Trend: favors Parker Washington by 0.5 percentage points, carrying 7 percent of the weight.
Recent Production
Weighted at 5% of this lens
Recent Production: favors Parker Washington by 0.5 percentage points, carrying 5 percent of the weight.
Totals: Parker Washington 2.3 points, Rome Odunze 0.0 points, for a final split of 53 to 47. 12 further categories scored too close to move the result.
| Category | Weight | Favors | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Upside | 10% | Parker Washington | 1.2 |
| 30-Day Trend | 7% | Parker Washington | 0.5 |
| Recent Production | 5% | Parker Washington | 0.5 |
| Category | Parker Washington | Rome Odunze |
|---|---|---|
| FF Beacon Value Current market value on the trusted FF Beacon scale for this format. Counts 28% toward the verdict for this lens | Parker Washington: 3,970 Best | Rome Odunze: 3,888 |
| Overall Rank Where each player sits among every player at every position. Counts 9% toward the verdict for this lens | Parker Washington: #68 BestUp 15 in 30 days | Rome Odunze: #71 Down 17 in 30 days |
| Positional Rank Rank within their own position group. Counts 7% toward the verdict for this lens | Parker Washington: WR28 BestTier 1 | Rome Odunze: WR30 Tier 2 |
| 30-Day Trend How each player's value has moved over the last month. Counts 7% toward the verdict for this lens | Parker Washington: +14.3% BestRange 3,350 to 4,039 | Rome Odunze: -15.8% Range 3,888 to 5,022 |
| Recent Production Most recent full-season finish within their position by fantasy points. Counts 5% toward the verdict for this lens | Parker Washington: WR27 (2025) BestBefore that: WR81, WR124 | Rome Odunze: WR41 (2025) Before that: WR49 |
| Opportunity Role on their team's depth chart, a proxy for expected volume. Counts 3% toward the verdict for this lens Even | Parker Washington: Starter Depth chart slot 1 | Rome Odunze: Starter Depth chart slot 1 |
| Health Current injury designation, which decides whether he can help you at all. Counts 1% toward the verdict for this lens | Parker Washington: Healthy Best | Rome Odunze: Questionable |
| Rest-of-Season Points Projected fantasy points across every remaining game, adjusted for matchups and reliability. Counts 3% toward the verdict for this lens | Parker Washington: 197.4 Best16 games left | Rome Odunze: 173.3 16 games left |
| Projected Per Game Average projected points in each remaining game. Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens | Parker Washington: 12.3 BestRange 9.4 to 15.3 | Rome Odunze: 10.8 Range 8.6 to 13.0 |
| Next Game Projected points in the very next game we have a projection for. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Parker Washington: 10.3 Week 2 vs DEN | Rome Odunze: 9.3 Week 2 vs MIN |
| Next Matchup How generous the next opponent has been to this position, from our own defensive splits. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Parker Washington: Neutral vs DEN, 1.00x | Rome Odunze: Neutral vs MIN, 1.00x |
| Remaining Schedule Average matchup difficulty across every game left, from our own defensive splits. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Parker Washington: Neutral 1.00x average | Rome Odunze: Neutral 1.00x average |
| Beat Rate How often he meets or beats his own weekly projection. Weeks he was projected for but missed count against him. Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens | Parker Washington: 64% Best41 graded games | Rome Odunze: 46% 38 graded games |
| Availability Share of the weeks he was projected for that he actually played. Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens Even | Parker Washington: 100% | Rome Odunze: 100% |
| Week-to-Week Consistency How much his weekly score bounces around his projection. Steadier is better for setting a lineup. Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens | Parker Washington: Lottery ticket Spread 0.96 | Rome Odunze: Swingy BestSpread 0.81 |
| Age & Long-Term Appeal Younger players hold value longer in dynasty formats. Counts 16% toward the verdict for this lens Even | Parker Washington: 24.5 yrs Year 4 | Rome Odunze: 24.3 yrs Year 3 |
| Risk Level Lower-risk profiles combine a steady weekly score, a proven tier, and prime age. Counts 5% toward the verdict for this lens | Parker Washington: Lottery ticket Best | Rome Odunze: Swingy |
| Upside Room to climb, blending recent momentum, youth, and tier. Counts 10% toward the verdict for this lens | Parker Washington: Breakout arrow Best | Rome Odunze: Ceiling play |
| Dynasty Outlook A plain-language read blending market value with age. Shown for context; its inputs are already scored above, so it does not count twice. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Parker Washington: Cornerstone Age 24.5 | Rome Odunze: Cornerstone Age 24.3 |
| Redraft Outlook A plain-language read blending rank with recent production. Shown for context; its inputs are already scored above. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Parker Washington: Matchup play | Rome Odunze: Matchup play |
FF Beacon Value
Current market value on the trusted FF Beacon scale for this format.
Counts 28% toward the verdict for this lens
Parker Washington
3,970
BestRome Odunze
3,888
Overall Rank
Where each player sits among every player at every position.
Counts 9% toward the verdict for this lens
Parker Washington
#68
BestUp 15 in 30 days
The plain-English answers, no table-reading required.
Best overall
Parker Washington takes 53% of the composite for dynasty value.
What is driving it
Parker Washington leads on ff beacon value and age & long-term appeal.
Safer floor
Rome Odunze is the steadiest weekly hold, carrying 2% of the dynasty value composite.
Higher upside
Parker Washington has the most room to climb from here.
Best trade target
Parker Washington carries the strongest current value.
Beacon Edge
Weighted for rest-of-season projection, production, and reliability
Parker Washington holds a slight edge on the Beacon Edge, averaged over 17 scored categories weighted for rest-of-season projection, production, and reliability. Ranked by composite: Parker Washington 53%, Rome Odunze 47%.
Averaged across 17 scored categories. The table below shows exactly which players and categories moved it.
Every player's share of the weighted average, ranked.
Parker Washington holds a slight edge on the Beacon Edge, averaged over 17 scored categories weighted for rest-of-season projection, production, and reliability. Ranked by composite: Parker Washington 53%, Rome Odunze 47%.
| Player | Composite |
|---|---|
| Parker Washington (leader) | 53% |
| Rome Odunze | 47% |
Each bar is how far that category moved the meter, in percentage points. They add up to the split above.
Each category's pull toward Parker Washington or Rome Odunze, in percentage points. Totals: Parker Washington 2.6 points, Rome Odunze 0.2 points, for a final split of 53 to 47.
Rest-of-Season Points
Weighted at 19% of this lens
Rest-of-Season Points: favors Parker Washington by 0.6 percentage points, carrying 19 percent of the weight.
Recent Production
Weighted at 8% of this lens
Recent Production: favors Parker Washington by 0.8 percentage points, carrying 8 percent of the weight.
Beat Rate
Weighted at 8% of this lens
Beat Rate: favors Parker Washington by 0.7 percentage points, carrying 8 percent of the weight.
| Category | Parker Washington | Rome Odunze |
|---|---|---|
| FF Beacon Value Current market value on the trusted FF Beacon scale for this format. Counts 6% toward the verdict for this lens | Parker Washington: 3,970 Best | Rome Odunze: 3,888 |
| Overall Rank Where each player sits among every player at every position. Counts 11% |
The plain-English answers, no table-reading required.
Best overall
Parker Washington takes 53% of the composite for the rest of this season.
What is driving it
Parker Washington leads on rest-of-season points and overall rank.
Beacon Edge
Weighted for next game's projection, matchup, and health
Parker Washington holds a slight edge on the Beacon Edge, averaged over 7 scored categories weighted for next game's projection, matchup, and health. Ranked by composite: Parker Washington 52%, Rome Odunze 48%.
Averaged across 7 scored categories. The table below shows exactly which players and categories moved it.
Every player's share of the weighted average, ranked.
Parker Washington holds a slight edge on the Beacon Edge, averaged over 7 scored categories weighted for next game's projection, matchup, and health. Ranked by composite: Parker Washington 52%, Rome Odunze 48%.
| Player | Composite |
|---|---|
| Parker Washington (leader) | 52% |
| Rome Odunze | 48% |
Each bar is how far that category moved the meter, in percentage points. They add up to the split above.
Each category's pull toward Parker Washington or Rome Odunze, in percentage points. Totals: Parker Washington 2.8 points, Rome Odunze 0.4 points, for a final split of 52 to 48.
Next Game
Weighted at 34% of this lens
Next Game: favors Parker Washington by 0.9 percentage points, carrying 34 percent of the weight.
Beat Rate
Weighted at 14% of this lens
Beat Rate: favors Parker Washington by 1.2 percentage points, carrying 14 percent of the weight.
Health
Weighted at 10% of this lens
Health: favors Parker Washington by 0.7 percentage points, carrying 10 percent of the weight.
| Category | Parker Washington | Rome Odunze |
|---|---|---|
| FF Beacon Value Current market value on the trusted FF Beacon scale for this format. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Parker Washington: 3,970 | Rome Odunze: 3,888 |
| Overall Rank Where each player sits among every player at every position. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Parker Washington: #68 |
The plain-English answers, no table-reading required.
Best overall
Parker Washington takes 52% of the composite for this week.
What is driving it
Parker Washington leads on next game and beat rate.
Every remaining game, projected and matchup-adjusted.
Parker Washington
Range 150 to 245 points. Schedule: neutral.
Rome Odunze
Range 138 to 209 points. Schedule: neutral.
Players with the same total can get there very differently. This is the shape.
Weekly projected points from week 2 to week 18. Parker Washington totals 197 points, Rome Odunze totals 173 points.
How generous each upcoming defense has been to this position, from our own splits going back to 2020. Above 1.00 helps the player.
Parker Washington has a neutral at 1.00 times average. Rome Odunze has a neutral at 1.00 times average.
Parker WashingtonNeutral
The band is one standard deviation either side, built from how much this player's own weekly scores actually bounce around, not a flat percentage.
Parker Washington projects for 197 points, in a range from 150 to 245. Rome Odunze projects for 173 points, in a range from 138 to 209.
Parker Washington
150 to 245 pts
Rome Odunze
138 to 209 pts
| Player | Floor | Projection | Ceiling |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parker Washington | 150 | 197 | 245 |
| Rome Odunze | 138 |
Projections start from Sleeper's weekly numbers and are then adjusted by our own model for how generous each opponent has been to the position, how reliably the player has hit the projection, how often the player has been available, and any current injury designation. This is the same model behind Power Pulse and the FAAB calculator.
Measured against each player's own weekly projections, not against each other.
Parker Washington
From 41 graded games across 41 projected weeks.
Rome Odunze
From 38 graded games across 38 projected weeks.
Every projected week of the 2026 season sorted by how the real game compared. Two players with the same average can live in completely different bars.
Parker Washington: 0 boom, 0 about right, 0 bust, 17 missed, out of 17 projected weeks. Rome Odunze: 0 boom, 0 about right, 0 bust, 17 missed, out of 17 projected weeks.
Parker Washington
Did not play 17
Rome Odunze
Did not play 17
| Player | Boom | About right | Bust |
|---|
A week a player was projected for but did not play counts as a miss, not as a week that never happened. Recent seasons count for far more than old ones, because roles and offenses change year to year. Both are deliberate: they make the number lower and more honest than a raw hit rate.
Draft price, value history, and the trades people actually made.
Parker Washington
Sleeper PPR ADP
up 15 in 30d
Value volatility over 30 days: 183.7.
Parker Washington is going about where we rank that player.
Rounds assume 12 teams.
Rome Odunze
Sleeper PPR ADP
down 17 in 30d
Value volatility over 30 days: 256.8.
Rome Odunze is going about where we rank that player.
Rounds assume 12 teams.
Redraft 1QB PPR, FF Beacon. Every player on one axis, so the shapes are directly comparable.
Parker Washington went from 2,870 to 3,970, up 1,100. Rome Odunze went from 5,282 to 3,888, down 1,394
Actual deals from leagues synced through League Pulse. What people paid, not what a calculator says they should have.
Dynasty PPR SF TEP
Sep 5, 2026
Regular-season totals, side by side. Best marks the top number in each row.
Overview
| Stat | Parker Washington | Rome Odunze |
|---|---|---|
| Games played | 16 Best | 12 |
| Total yards | 847 Best | 661 |
| Scrimmage yards | 847 Best | 661 |
| Total TDs | 5 | 6 Best |
| Fantasy points (PPR) | 184.7 Best | 146.1 |
| PPR per game | 11.5 | 12.2 Best |
Rushing
| Stat | Parker Washington | Rome Odunze |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 7 Best | 0 |
Receiving
| Stat | Parker Washington | Rome Odunze |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 95 Best | 90 |
| Receptions | 58 Best | 44 |
| Catch % | 61.1% Best | 48.9% |
| Receiving yards | 847 Best | 661 |
| Receiving TDs | 5 | 6 Best |
| Yards / catch | 14.6 | 15.0 Best |
| Yards / target | 8.9 Best | 7.3 |
One stat, week by week, for every player.
| Week | Parker Washington | Rome Odunze |
|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | 0 vs CAR | 37 Bestvs MIN |
| Wk 2 | 76 vs CIN | 128 Bestvs DET |
| Wk 3 | 34 vs HOU | 62 Bestvs DAL |
| Wk 4 | -1 vs SF | 69 Bestvs LV |
| Wk 5 | 16 Bestvs KC | - |
| Wk 6 | 29 vs SEA | 32 Bestvs WAS |
| Wk 7 | 62 Bestvs LAR | 31 vs NO |
| Wk 8 | - | 114 Bestvs BAL |
| Wk 9 | 90 Bestvs LV | 0 vs CIN |
| Wk 10 | 29 vs HOU | 86 Bestvs NYG |
| Wk 11 | 20 vs LAC | 41 Bestvs MIN |
| Wk 12 | 71 Bestvs ARI | 53 vs PIT |
| Wk 13 | 26 Bestvs TEN | 8 vs PHI |
| Wk 15 | 53 Bestvs NYJ | 0 vs CLE |
| Wk 16 | 145 Bestvs DEN | - |
| Wk 17 | 110 Bestvs IND | - |
| Wk 18 | 87 Bestvs TEN | - |
Real trades are rarely one player for one player. If these players are only part of a bigger deal, build the whole thing in the Signal Check trade calculator: it prices multi-player packages and draft picks together and grades the trade end to end.
Build the full trade in the Signal Check Trade CalculatorRome Odunze
#71
Down 17 in 30 days
Positional Rank
Rank within their own position group.
Counts 7% toward the verdict for this lens
Parker Washington
WR28
BestTier 1
Rome Odunze
WR30
Tier 2
30-Day Trend
How each player's value has moved over the last month.
Counts 7% toward the verdict for this lens
Parker Washington
+14.3%
BestRange 3,350 to 4,039
Rome Odunze
-15.8%
Range 3,888 to 5,022
Recent Production
Most recent full-season finish within their position by fantasy points.
Counts 5% toward the verdict for this lens
Parker Washington
WR27 (2025)
BestBefore that: WR81, WR124
Rome Odunze
WR41 (2025)
Before that: WR49
Opportunity
Role on their team's depth chart, a proxy for expected volume.
Counts 3% toward the verdict for this lens
Even
Parker Washington
Starter
Depth chart slot 1
Rome Odunze
Starter
Depth chart slot 1
Health
Current injury designation, which decides whether he can help you at all.
Counts 1% toward the verdict for this lens
Parker Washington
Healthy
BestRome Odunze
Questionable
Rest-of-Season Points
Projected fantasy points across every remaining game, adjusted for matchups and reliability.
Counts 3% toward the verdict for this lens
Parker Washington
197.4
Best16 games left
Rome Odunze
173.3
16 games left
Projected Per Game
Average projected points in each remaining game.
Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens
Parker Washington
12.3
BestRange 9.4 to 15.3
Rome Odunze
10.8
Range 8.6 to 13.0
Next Game
Projected points in the very next game we have a projection for.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Parker Washington
10.3
Week 2 vs DEN
Rome Odunze
9.3
Week 2 vs MIN
Next Matchup
How generous the next opponent has been to this position, from our own defensive splits.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Parker Washington
Neutral
vs DEN, 1.00x
Rome Odunze
Neutral
vs MIN, 1.00x
Remaining Schedule
Average matchup difficulty across every game left, from our own defensive splits.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Parker Washington
Neutral
1.00x average
Rome Odunze
Neutral
1.00x average
Beat Rate
How often he meets or beats his own weekly projection. Weeks he was projected for but missed count against him.
Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens
Parker Washington
64%
Best41 graded games
Rome Odunze
46%
38 graded games
Availability
Share of the weeks he was projected for that he actually played.
Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens
Even
Parker Washington
100%
Rome Odunze
100%
Week-to-Week Consistency
How much his weekly score bounces around his projection. Steadier is better for setting a lineup.
Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens
Parker Washington
Lottery ticket
Spread 0.96
Rome Odunze
Swingy
BestSpread 0.81
Age & Long-Term Appeal
Younger players hold value longer in dynasty formats.
Counts 16% toward the verdict for this lens
Even
Parker Washington
24.5 yrs
Year 4
Rome Odunze
24.3 yrs
Year 3
Risk Level
Lower-risk profiles combine a steady weekly score, a proven tier, and prime age.
Counts 5% toward the verdict for this lens
Parker Washington
Lottery ticket
BestRome Odunze
Swingy
Upside
Room to climb, blending recent momentum, youth, and tier.
Counts 10% toward the verdict for this lens
Parker Washington
Breakout arrow
BestRome Odunze
Ceiling play
Dynasty Outlook
A plain-language read blending market value with age. Shown for context; its inputs are already scored above, so it does not count twice.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Parker Washington
Cornerstone
Age 24.5
Rome Odunze
Cornerstone
Age 24.3
Redraft Outlook
A plain-language read blending rank with recent production. Shown for context; its inputs are already scored above.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Parker Washington
Matchup play
Rome Odunze
Matchup play
Projected Per Game
Weighted at 8% of this lens
Projected Per Game: favors Parker Washington by 0.3 percentage points, carrying 8 percent of the weight.
Week-to-Week Consistency
Weighted at 5% of this lens
Week-to-Week Consistency: favors Rome Odunze by 0.2 percentage points, carrying 5 percent of the weight.
Health
Weighted at 3% of this lens
Health: favors Parker Washington by 0.2 percentage points, carrying 3 percent of the weight.
Totals: Parker Washington 2.6 points, Rome Odunze 0.2 points, for a final split of 53 to 47. 11 further categories scored too close to move the result.
| Category | Weight | Favors | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rest-of-Season Points | 19% | Parker Washington | 0.6 |
| Recent Production | 8% | Parker Washington | 0.8 |
| Beat Rate | 8% | Parker Washington | 0.7 |
| Projected Per Game | 8% | Parker Washington | 0.3 |
| Week-to-Week Consistency | 5% | Rome Odunze | 0.2 |
| Health | 3% | Parker Washington | 0.2 |
Parker Washington: #68 BestUp 15 in 30 days |
Rome Odunze: #71 Down 17 in 30 days |
| Positional Rank Rank within their own position group. Counts 5% toward the verdict for this lens | Parker Washington: WR28 BestTier 1 | Rome Odunze: WR30 Tier 2 |
|---|
| 30-Day Trend How each player's value has moved over the last month. Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens | Parker Washington: +14.3% BestRange 3,350 to 4,039 | Rome Odunze: -15.8% Range 3,888 to 5,022 |
|---|
| Recent Production Most recent full-season finish within their position by fantasy points. Counts 8% toward the verdict for this lens | Parker Washington: WR27 (2025) BestBefore that: WR81, WR124 | Rome Odunze: WR41 (2025) Before that: WR49 |
|---|
| Opportunity Role on their team's depth chart, a proxy for expected volume. Counts 6% toward the verdict for this lens Even | Parker Washington: Starter Depth chart slot 1 | Rome Odunze: Starter Depth chart slot 1 |
|---|
| Health Current injury designation, which decides whether he can help you at all. Counts 3% toward the verdict for this lens | Parker Washington: Healthy Best | Rome Odunze: Questionable |
|---|
| Rest-of-Season Points Projected fantasy points across every remaining game, adjusted for matchups and reliability. Counts 19% toward the verdict for this lens | Parker Washington: 197.4 Best16 games left | Rome Odunze: 173.3 16 games left |
|---|
| Projected Per Game Average projected points in each remaining game. Counts 8% toward the verdict for this lens | Parker Washington: 12.3 BestRange 9.4 to 15.3 | Rome Odunze: 10.8 Range 8.6 to 13.0 |
|---|
| Next Game Projected points in the very next game we have a projection for. Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens | Parker Washington: 10.3 BestWeek 2 vs DEN | Rome Odunze: 9.3 Week 2 vs MIN |
|---|
| Next Matchup How generous the next opponent has been to this position, from our own defensive splits. Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens Even | Parker Washington: Neutral vs DEN, 1.00x | Rome Odunze: Neutral vs MIN, 1.00x |
|---|
| Remaining Schedule Average matchup difficulty across every game left, from our own defensive splits. Counts 5% toward the verdict for this lens Even | Parker Washington: Neutral 1.00x average | Rome Odunze: Neutral 1.00x average |
|---|
| Beat Rate How often he meets or beats his own weekly projection. Weeks he was projected for but missed count against him. Counts 8% toward the verdict for this lens | Parker Washington: 64% Best41 graded games | Rome Odunze: 46% 38 graded games |
|---|
| Availability Share of the weeks he was projected for that he actually played. Counts 6% toward the verdict for this lens Even | Parker Washington: 100% | Rome Odunze: 100% |
|---|
| Week-to-Week Consistency How much his weekly score bounces around his projection. Steadier is better for setting a lineup. Counts 5% toward the verdict for this lens | Parker Washington: Lottery ticket Spread 0.96 | Rome Odunze: Swingy BestSpread 0.81 |
|---|
| Age & Long-Term Appeal Younger players hold value longer in dynasty formats. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Parker Washington: 24.5 yrs Year 4 | Rome Odunze: 24.3 yrs Year 3 |
|---|
| Risk Level Lower-risk profiles combine a steady weekly score, a proven tier, and prime age. Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens | Parker Washington: Lottery ticket Best | Rome Odunze: Swingy |
|---|
| Upside Room to climb, blending recent momentum, youth, and tier. Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens | Parker Washington: Breakout arrow Best | Rome Odunze: Ceiling play |
|---|
| Dynasty Outlook A plain-language read blending market value with age. Shown for context; its inputs are already scored above, so it does not count twice. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Parker Washington: Cornerstone Age 24.5 | Rome Odunze: Cornerstone Age 24.3 |
|---|
| Redraft Outlook A plain-language read blending rank with recent production. Shown for context; its inputs are already scored above. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Parker Washington: Matchup play | Rome Odunze: Matchup play |
|---|
FF Beacon Value
Current market value on the trusted FF Beacon scale for this format.
Counts 6% toward the verdict for this lens
Parker Washington
3,970
BestRome Odunze
3,888
Overall Rank
Where each player sits among every player at every position.
Counts 11% toward the verdict for this lens
Parker Washington
#68
BestUp 15 in 30 days
Rome Odunze
#71
Down 17 in 30 days
Positional Rank
Rank within their own position group.
Counts 5% toward the verdict for this lens
Parker Washington
WR28
BestTier 1
Rome Odunze
WR30
Tier 2
30-Day Trend
How each player's value has moved over the last month.
Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens
Parker Washington
+14.3%
BestRange 3,350 to 4,039
Rome Odunze
-15.8%
Range 3,888 to 5,022
Recent Production
Most recent full-season finish within their position by fantasy points.
Counts 8% toward the verdict for this lens
Parker Washington
WR27 (2025)
BestBefore that: WR81, WR124
Rome Odunze
WR41 (2025)
Before that: WR49
Opportunity
Role on their team's depth chart, a proxy for expected volume.
Counts 6% toward the verdict for this lens
Even
Parker Washington
Starter
Depth chart slot 1
Rome Odunze
Starter
Depth chart slot 1
Health
Current injury designation, which decides whether he can help you at all.
Counts 3% toward the verdict for this lens
Parker Washington
Healthy
BestRome Odunze
Questionable
Rest-of-Season Points
Projected fantasy points across every remaining game, adjusted for matchups and reliability.
Counts 19% toward the verdict for this lens
Parker Washington
197.4
Best16 games left
Rome Odunze
173.3
16 games left
Projected Per Game
Average projected points in each remaining game.
Counts 8% toward the verdict for this lens
Parker Washington
12.3
BestRange 9.4 to 15.3
Rome Odunze
10.8
Range 8.6 to 13.0
Next Game
Projected points in the very next game we have a projection for.
Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens
Parker Washington
10.3
BestWeek 2 vs DEN
Rome Odunze
9.3
Week 2 vs MIN
Next Matchup
How generous the next opponent has been to this position, from our own defensive splits.
Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens
Even
Parker Washington
Neutral
vs DEN, 1.00x
Rome Odunze
Neutral
vs MIN, 1.00x
Remaining Schedule
Average matchup difficulty across every game left, from our own defensive splits.
Counts 5% toward the verdict for this lens
Even
Parker Washington
Neutral
1.00x average
Rome Odunze
Neutral
1.00x average
Beat Rate
How often he meets or beats his own weekly projection. Weeks he was projected for but missed count against him.
Counts 8% toward the verdict for this lens
Parker Washington
64%
Best41 graded games
Rome Odunze
46%
38 graded games
Availability
Share of the weeks he was projected for that he actually played.
Counts 6% toward the verdict for this lens
Even
Parker Washington
100%
Rome Odunze
100%
Week-to-Week Consistency
How much his weekly score bounces around his projection. Steadier is better for setting a lineup.
Counts 5% toward the verdict for this lens
Parker Washington
Lottery ticket
Spread 0.96
Rome Odunze
Swingy
BestSpread 0.81
Age & Long-Term Appeal
Younger players hold value longer in dynasty formats.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Parker Washington
24.5 yrs
Year 4
Rome Odunze
24.3 yrs
Year 3
Risk Level
Lower-risk profiles combine a steady weekly score, a proven tier, and prime age.
Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens
Parker Washington
Lottery ticket
BestRome Odunze
Swingy
Upside
Room to climb, blending recent momentum, youth, and tier.
Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens
Parker Washington
Breakout arrow
BestRome Odunze
Ceiling play
Dynasty Outlook
A plain-language read blending market value with age. Shown for context; its inputs are already scored above, so it does not count twice.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Parker Washington
Cornerstone
Age 24.5
Rome Odunze
Cornerstone
Age 24.3
Redraft Outlook
A plain-language read blending rank with recent production. Shown for context; its inputs are already scored above.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Parker Washington
Matchup play
Rome Odunze
Matchup play
Safer floor
Rome Odunze is the steadiest weekly hold, carrying 5% of the the rest of this season composite.
Higher upside
Parker Washington has the most room to climb from here.
Best trade target
Parker Washington carries the strongest current value.
Week-to-Week Consistency
Weighted at 10% of this lens
Week-to-Week Consistency: favors Rome Odunze by 0.4 percentage points, carrying 10 percent of the weight.
Totals: Parker Washington 2.8 points, Rome Odunze 0.4 points, for a final split of 52 to 48. 3 further categories scored too close to move the result.
| Category | Weight | Favors | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Game | 34% | Parker Washington | 0.9 |
| Beat Rate | 14% | Parker Washington | 1.2 |
| Health | 10% | Parker Washington | 0.7 |
| Week-to-Week Consistency | 10% | Rome Odunze | 0.4 |
Up 15 in 30 days
Rome Odunze: #71 Down 17 in 30 days |
| Positional Rank Rank within their own position group. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Parker Washington: WR28 Tier 1 | Rome Odunze: WR30 Tier 2 |
|---|
| 30-Day Trend How each player's value has moved over the last month. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Parker Washington: +14.3% Range 3,350 to 4,039 | Rome Odunze: -15.8% Range 3,888 to 5,022 |
|---|
| Recent Production Most recent full-season finish within their position by fantasy points. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Parker Washington: WR27 (2025) Before that: WR81, WR124 | Rome Odunze: WR41 (2025) Before that: WR49 |
|---|
| Opportunity Role on their team's depth chart, a proxy for expected volume. Counts 12% toward the verdict for this lens Even | Parker Washington: Starter Depth chart slot 1 | Rome Odunze: Starter Depth chart slot 1 |
|---|
| Health Current injury designation, which decides whether he can help you at all. Counts 10% toward the verdict for this lens | Parker Washington: Healthy Best | Rome Odunze: Questionable |
|---|
| Rest-of-Season Points Projected fantasy points across every remaining game, adjusted for matchups and reliability. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Parker Washington: 197.4 16 games left | Rome Odunze: 173.3 16 games left |
|---|
| Projected Per Game Average projected points in each remaining game. Counts 4% toward the verdict for this lens | Parker Washington: 12.3 BestRange 9.4 to 15.3 | Rome Odunze: 10.8 Range 8.6 to 13.0 |
|---|
| Next Game Projected points in the very next game we have a projection for. Counts 34% toward the verdict for this lens | Parker Washington: 10.3 BestWeek 2 vs DEN | Rome Odunze: 9.3 Week 2 vs MIN |
|---|
| Next Matchup How generous the next opponent has been to this position, from our own defensive splits. Counts 16% toward the verdict for this lens Even | Parker Washington: Neutral vs DEN, 1.00x | Rome Odunze: Neutral vs MIN, 1.00x |
|---|
| Remaining Schedule Average matchup difficulty across every game left, from our own defensive splits. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Parker Washington: Neutral 1.00x average | Rome Odunze: Neutral 1.00x average |
|---|
| Beat Rate How often he meets or beats his own weekly projection. Weeks he was projected for but missed count against him. Counts 14% toward the verdict for this lens | Parker Washington: 64% Best41 graded games | Rome Odunze: 46% 38 graded games |
|---|
| Availability Share of the weeks he was projected for that he actually played. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Parker Washington: 100% | Rome Odunze: 100% |
|---|
| Week-to-Week Consistency How much his weekly score bounces around his projection. Steadier is better for setting a lineup. Counts 10% toward the verdict for this lens | Parker Washington: Lottery ticket Spread 0.96 | Rome Odunze: Swingy BestSpread 0.81 |
|---|
| Age & Long-Term Appeal Younger players hold value longer in dynasty formats. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Parker Washington: 24.5 yrs Year 4 | Rome Odunze: 24.3 yrs Year 3 |
|---|
| Risk Level Lower-risk profiles combine a steady weekly score, a proven tier, and prime age. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Parker Washington: Lottery ticket | Rome Odunze: Swingy |
|---|
| Upside Room to climb, blending recent momentum, youth, and tier. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Parker Washington: Breakout arrow | Rome Odunze: Ceiling play |
|---|
| Dynasty Outlook A plain-language read blending market value with age. Shown for context; its inputs are already scored above, so it does not count twice. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Parker Washington: Cornerstone Age 24.5 | Rome Odunze: Cornerstone Age 24.3 |
|---|
| Redraft Outlook A plain-language read blending rank with recent production. Shown for context; its inputs are already scored above. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Parker Washington: Matchup play | Rome Odunze: Matchup play |
|---|
FF Beacon Value
Current market value on the trusted FF Beacon scale for this format.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Parker Washington
3,970
Rome Odunze
3,888
Overall Rank
Where each player sits among every player at every position.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Parker Washington
#68
Up 15 in 30 days
Rome Odunze
#71
Down 17 in 30 days
Positional Rank
Rank within their own position group.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Parker Washington
WR28
Tier 1
Rome Odunze
WR30
Tier 2
30-Day Trend
How each player's value has moved over the last month.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Parker Washington
+14.3%
Range 3,350 to 4,039
Rome Odunze
-15.8%
Range 3,888 to 5,022
Recent Production
Most recent full-season finish within their position by fantasy points.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Parker Washington
WR27 (2025)
Before that: WR81, WR124
Rome Odunze
WR41 (2025)
Before that: WR49
Opportunity
Role on their team's depth chart, a proxy for expected volume.
Counts 12% toward the verdict for this lens
Even
Parker Washington
Starter
Depth chart slot 1
Rome Odunze
Starter
Depth chart slot 1
Health
Current injury designation, which decides whether he can help you at all.
Counts 10% toward the verdict for this lens
Parker Washington
Healthy
BestRome Odunze
Questionable
Rest-of-Season Points
Projected fantasy points across every remaining game, adjusted for matchups and reliability.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Parker Washington
197.4
16 games left
Rome Odunze
173.3
16 games left
Projected Per Game
Average projected points in each remaining game.
Counts 4% toward the verdict for this lens
Parker Washington
12.3
BestRange 9.4 to 15.3
Rome Odunze
10.8
Range 8.6 to 13.0
Next Game
Projected points in the very next game we have a projection for.
Counts 34% toward the verdict for this lens
Parker Washington
10.3
BestWeek 2 vs DEN
Rome Odunze
9.3
Week 2 vs MIN
Next Matchup
How generous the next opponent has been to this position, from our own defensive splits.
Counts 16% toward the verdict for this lens
Even
Parker Washington
Neutral
vs DEN, 1.00x
Rome Odunze
Neutral
vs MIN, 1.00x
Remaining Schedule
Average matchup difficulty across every game left, from our own defensive splits.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Parker Washington
Neutral
1.00x average
Rome Odunze
Neutral
1.00x average
Beat Rate
How often he meets or beats his own weekly projection. Weeks he was projected for but missed count against him.
Counts 14% toward the verdict for this lens
Parker Washington
64%
Best41 graded games
Rome Odunze
46%
38 graded games
Availability
Share of the weeks he was projected for that he actually played.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Parker Washington
100%
Rome Odunze
100%
Week-to-Week Consistency
How much his weekly score bounces around his projection. Steadier is better for setting a lineup.
Counts 10% toward the verdict for this lens
Parker Washington
Lottery ticket
Spread 0.96
Rome Odunze
Swingy
BestSpread 0.81
Age & Long-Term Appeal
Younger players hold value longer in dynasty formats.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Parker Washington
24.5 yrs
Year 4
Rome Odunze
24.3 yrs
Year 3
Risk Level
Lower-risk profiles combine a steady weekly score, a proven tier, and prime age.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Parker Washington
Lottery ticket
Rome Odunze
Swingy
Upside
Room to climb, blending recent momentum, youth, and tier.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Parker Washington
Breakout arrow
Rome Odunze
Ceiling play
Dynasty Outlook
A plain-language read blending market value with age. Shown for context; its inputs are already scored above, so it does not count twice.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Parker Washington
Cornerstone
Age 24.5
Rome Odunze
Cornerstone
Age 24.3
Redraft Outlook
A plain-language read blending rank with recent production. Shown for context; its inputs are already scored above.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Parker Washington
Matchup play
Rome Odunze
Matchup play
Safer floor
Rome Odunze is the steadiest weekly hold, carrying 10% of the this week composite.
| Week | Parker Washington | Opponent | Rome Odunze | Opponent |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 10.3 | DEN | 9.3 | MIN |
| 3 | 12.6 | NE | 9.6 | PHI |
| 4 | 13.2 | CIN | 11.8 | NYJ |
| 5 | 10.7 | PHI | 11.4 | GB |
| 6 | 11.3 | HOU | 11.0 | ATL |
| 7 | Bye | - | 11.5 | NE |
| 8 | 12.3 | IND | 9.8 | SEA |
| 9 | 12.1 | BAL | 11.6 | TB |
| 10 | 13.4 | TEN | Bye | - |
| 11 | 11.7 | NYG | 11.3 | NO |
| 12 | 13.4 | TEN | 11.0 | DET |
| 13 | 13.3 | CHI | 10.0 | JAX |
| 14 | 11.8 | PIT | 11.9 | MIA |
| 15 | 11.3 | HOU | 10.3 | BUF |
| 16 | 13.8 | DAL | 11.4 | GB |
| 17 | 13.8 | WAS | 11.0 | DET |
| 18 | 12.3 | IND | 10.3 | MIN |
Rome OdunzeNeutral
| Player | Week | Opponent | Multiplier | Read |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parker Washington | 2 | DEN | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Parker Washington | 3 | NE | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Parker Washington | 4 | CIN | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Parker Washington | 5 | PHI | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Parker Washington | 6 | HOU | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Parker Washington | 8 | IND | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Parker Washington | 9 | BAL | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Parker Washington | 10 | TEN | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Parker Washington | 11 | NYG | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Parker Washington | 12 | TEN | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Parker Washington | 13 | CHI | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Parker Washington | 14 | PIT | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Parker Washington | 15 | HOU | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Parker Washington | 16 | DAL | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Parker Washington | 17 | WAS | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Parker Washington | 18 | IND | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Rome Odunze | 2 | MIN | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Rome Odunze | 3 | PHI | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Rome Odunze | 4 | NYJ | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Rome Odunze | 5 | GB | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Rome Odunze | 6 | ATL | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Rome Odunze | 7 | NE | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Rome Odunze | 8 | SEA | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Rome Odunze | 9 | TB | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Rome Odunze | 11 | NO | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Rome Odunze | 12 | DET | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Rome Odunze | 13 | JAX | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Rome Odunze | 14 | MIA | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Rome Odunze | 15 | BUF | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Rome Odunze | 16 | GB | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Rome Odunze | 17 | DET | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Rome Odunze | 18 | MIN | 1.00 | Neutral |
| 173 |
| 209 |
| Did not play |
|---|
| Weeks |
|---|
| Parker Washington | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 17 |
| Rome Odunze | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 17 |
| Date | Parker Washington | Rome Odunze |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2026 | 3,970 | 3,888 |
| Sep 10, 2026 | 4,014 | 3,931 |
| Sep 9, 2026 | 3,777 | 4,743 |
| Sep 8, 2026 | 3,761 | 4,643 |
| Sep 7, 2026 | 3,830 | 4,672 |
| Sep 6, 2026 | 3,819 | 4,881 |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3,757 | 4,746 |
| Sep 4, 2026 | 3,726 | 4,851 |
| Sep 3, 2026 | 3,750 | 4,834 |
| Sep 2, 2026 | 3,613 | 4,621 |
| Sep 1, 2026 | 3,568 | 4,654 |
| Aug 31, 2026 | 3,566 | 4,647 |
| Aug 30, 2026 | 3,535 | 4,617 |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3,528 | 4,672 |
| Aug 28, 2026 | 3,446 | 4,632 |
| Aug 27, 2026 | 3,381 | 4,736 |
| Aug 26, 2026 | 3,350 | 4,899 |
| Aug 25, 2026 | 4,039 | 5,022 |
| Aug 24, 2026 | 3,988 | 4,906 |
| Aug 23, 2026 | 3,900 | 4,818 |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3,858 | 4,878 |
| Aug 21, 2026 | 3,815 | 4,824 |
| Aug 20, 2026 | 3,807 | 4,894 |
| Aug 19, 2026 | 3,880 | 4,965 |
| Aug 18, 2026 | 3,840 | 4,971 |
| Aug 17, 2026 | 3,871 | 4,966 |
| Aug 16, 2026 | 3,733 | 4,926 |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3,665 | 4,923 |
| Aug 13, 2026 | 3,514 | 4,804 |
| Aug 12, 2026 | 3,472 | 4,615 |
| Aug 11, 2026 | 3,407 | 4,669 |
| Aug 10, 2026 | 3,430 | 4,771 |
| Aug 9, 2026 | 3,482 | 4,769 |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3,456 | 4,808 |
| Aug 7, 2026 | 3,530 | 4,867 |
| Aug 6, 2026 | 3,413 | 4,823 |
| Aug 5, 2026 | 3,231 | 4,816 |
| Aug 4, 2026 | 3,197 | 4,781 |
| Aug 3, 2026 | 3,183 | 4,828 |
| Aug 2, 2026 | 3,084 | 4,874 |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3,139 | 4,827 |
| Jul 31, 2026 | 3,177 | 4,846 |
| Jul 30, 2026 | 3,123 | 4,901 |
| Jul 29, 2026 | 2,988 | 4,670 |
| Jul 28, 2026 | 3,083 | 4,632 |
| Jul 27, 2026 | 3,058 | 4,639 |
| Jul 26, 2026 | 3,018 | 4,756 |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3,024 | 4,840 |
| Jul 24, 2026 | 3,040 | 4,824 |
| Jul 23, 2026 | 2,962 | 4,814 |
| Jul 22, 2026 | 2,912 | 4,839 |
| Jul 21, 2026 | 2,885 | 4,833 |
| Jul 20, 2026 | 2,937 | 4,977 |
| Jul 19, 2026 | 2,960 | 4,975 |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2,956 | 4,984 |
| Jul 17, 2026 | 2,955 | 4,944 |
| Jul 16, 2026 | 2,959 | 4,939 |
| Jul 15, 2026 | 2,886 | 4,964 |
| Jul 14, 2026 | 2,942 | 4,941 |
| Jul 13, 2026 | 2,906 | 4,936 |
| Jul 12, 2026 | 2,930 | 4,976 |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2,969 | 4,947 |
| Jul 10, 2026 | 3,016 | 4,942 |
| Jul 9, 2026 | 2,999 | 4,959 |
| Jul 8, 2026 | 2,975 | 4,951 |
| Jul 7, 2026 | 2,958 | 4,973 |
| Jul 6, 2026 | 3,003 | 4,971 |
| Jul 5, 2026 | 2,977 | 4,995 |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2,976 | 5,007 |
| Jul 3, 2026 | 3,027 | 5,066 |
| Jul 2, 2026 | 3,086 | 5,018 |
| Jul 1, 2026 | 3,136 | 4,992 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | 3,144 | 4,985 |
| Jun 29, 2026 | 3,140 | 4,997 |
| Jun 28, 2026 | 3,140 | 5,037 |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3,096 | 5,033 |
| Jun 26, 2026 | 3,095 | 4,990 |
| Jun 25, 2026 | 3,109 | 4,982 |
| Jun 24, 2026 | 3,120 | 4,916 |
| Jun 23, 2026 | 3,148 | 4,949 |
| Jun 22, 2026 | 3,160 | 4,954 |
| Jun 21, 2026 | 3,160 | 4,951 |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3,180 | 5,018 |
| Jun 19, 2026 | 3,156 | 5,027 |
| Jun 18, 2026 | 3,161 | 5,064 |
| Jun 17, 2026 | 3,166 | 5,072 |
| Jun 16, 2026 | 3,067 | 5,063 |
| Jun 15, 2026 | 2,985 | 5,172 |
| Jun 14, 2026 | 2,909 | 5,226 |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2,870 | 5,282 |
Dynasty PPR SF TEP
Sep 4, 2026
Dynasty PPR SF TEP
Sep 4, 2026
Redraft 1QB PPR
Sep 7, 2026
Redraft 1QB PPR
Sep 7, 2026
Dynasty PPR SF TEP
Sep 3, 2026