Will Reichard or Wil Lutz?
Start Will Reichard. Reichard projects 0.0 points clear of Wil Lutz in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Lutz.
Will Reichard
StartTools
Working out who to start.
Week 2
Real Week 2 comparisons with the verdict already worked out. Open any of them on the board for the full breakdown.
Start Will Reichard. Reichard projects 0.0 points clear of Wil Lutz in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Lutz.
Will Reichard
StartThe method
It starts with a weekly point projection from Sleeper, rescored under the format set in the site header rather than left in one generic scoring. That single adjustment is why a TE premium league or a superflex league can see a different lean than a standard league for the same two players.
Still not sure?
The confidence figure gives you a clear lean, but a close start/sit call can stay close. Bring it to our Discord and real fantasy managers will help you settle it for free. Want to know what's behind FF Beacon? Read about the project.
K
MIN
6.2 projected points
Wil Lutz
SitK
DEN
6.2 projected points
Start Mike Evans. Evans projects 0.0 points clear of Malik Nabers in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Nabers.
Mike Evans
StartWR
SF
13.7 projected points
Malik Nabers
SitWR
NYG
13.7 projected points
Start Courtland Sutton. Sutton projects 0.0 points clear of Parker Washington in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Washington.
Courtland Sutton
StartWR
DEN
10.3 projected points
Parker Washington
SitWR
JAX
10.3 projected points
Start Saquon Barkley. Barkley projects 0.0 points clear of David Montgomery in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Montgomery.
Saquon Barkley
StartRB
PHI
16.7 projected points
David Montgomery
SitRB
HOU
16.7 projected points
Start Tyler Warren. Warren projects 0.0 points clear of Travis Kelce in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Kelce.
Tyler Warren
StartTE
IND
11.4 projected points
Travis Kelce
SitTE
KC
11.4 projected points
Start Brandon Aubrey. Aubrey projects 0.0 points clear of Ka'imi Fairbairn in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Fairbairn.
Brandon Aubrey
StartK
DAL
7.5 projected points
Ka'imi Fairbairn
SitK
HOU
7.5 projected points
Start Ja'Marr Chase. Chase projects 0.1 points clear of Amon-Ra St. Brown in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Brown.
Ja'Marr Chase
StartWR
CIN
18.3 projected points
Amon-Ra St. Brown
SitWR
DET
18.3 projected points
Start Luther Burden. Burden projects 0.0 points clear of DK Metcalf in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Metcalf.
Luther Burden
StartWR
CHI
12.3 projected points
DK Metcalf
SitWR
PIT
12.3 projected points
Start Evan McPherson. McPherson projects 0.0 points clear of Jake Bates in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Bates.
Evan McPherson
StartK
CIN
6.0 projected points
Jake Bates
SitK
DET
5.9 projected points
Start De'Von Achane. Achane projects 0.1 points clear of Kyren Williams in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Williams.
De'Von Achane
StartRB
MIA
17.9 projected points
Kyren Williams
SitRB
LAR
17.8 projected points
Start Cleveland Browns. Browns projects 0.0 points clear of New Orleans Saints in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Saints.
Cleveland Browns
StartDEF
CLE
5.0 projected points
New Orleans Saints
SitDEF
NO
5.0 projected points
Start Josh Allen. Allen projects 0.1 points clear of Lamar Jackson in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Jackson.
Josh Allen
StartQB
BUF
21.0 projected points
Lamar Jackson
SitQB
BAL
20.9 projected points
Next comes the matchup: how many fantasy points the opposing defense has allowed to that position, measured from our own player-by-player results rather than taken from the projection source, and adjusted for the strength of the offenses that defense actually faced. It blends the two most recent seasons of games actually played, weighting the more recent one heavier.
Then a reliability discount: how often the player has actually beaten the player's own projection in games graded so far this season, and how often the player has been available to play at all. A boom-or-bust player gets pulled back toward the field; a steady one keeps more of that projected number.
Finally, the confidence figure: the probability that the player you are told to start actually outscores the closest player left on the bench, built from the same win-probability math the League Pulse schedule board uses to grade a matchup.
Projections and injury designations refresh once a day; the timestamp above the board is the exact time the numbers you are looking at were last pulled.
Scoring formats
The format chip at the top of the board follows whatever you have set in the site header, and every player's projection is repriced under that scoring rather than shown once in a single format. PPR and half PPR change how much a high-target pass catcher is worth next to a workhorse runner; standard drops the reception bonus entirely and shifts the whole board toward touchdowns and yardage.
TE premium and superflex are treated as real formats here, not a checkbox bolted onto a PPR number, because both change who the better start actually is. For a deeper look at where a player ranks under your own scoring, see the full Redraft 1QB PPR rankings board or browse rankings for every format we support.
Your board is set to
Redraft 1QB PPR
Change it from the format control in the site header.
Volume decides most quarterback weeks before the matchup does. A quarterback who throws forty times and adds rushing work on top can outscore a tougher matchup through pure opportunity, which is why the projection starts from expected attempts and carries, not from a single highlight-worthy throw. After volume, the tool weighs the matchup: how many points the opposing defense has allowed to the position, adjusted for the offenses that defense actually faced. Game environment matters too. A quarterback expected to trail throws more; one expected to lead runs the clock out and throws less. Rushing floor is usually what separates two similar passers when their passing numbers project close together.
Start Josh Allen. Allen projects 0.1 points clear of Lamar Jackson in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Jackson.
Full breakdown: Allen vs JacksonTarget share moves a wide receiver's projection more than any other number, because a receiver who sees the ball ten times a game keeps a real floor even on a week the catches go for short gains. After volume, the tool looks at the matchup a receiver actually draws, the gap between a shadow cornerback and a zone look, folded into the defense's points allowed to the position rather than guessed at separately. Game script cuts the other way from running backs: a team expected to trail throws more, which lifts every pass catcher on the roster, including one who would otherwise look like the week's riskier option.
Target share does the most work at tight end, because touchdown-dependent, boom-or-bust production is what separates a usable weekly starter from a name a reader only half recognizes. The tool leans on route participation and red-zone role ahead of raw catch totals, since a tight end on the field for every pass play keeps a real floor even in a game that never turns into a shootout. Matchup still counts, particularly against a defense that struggles to cover the position out of its base personnel, but the gap between replacement level and the position's best players is unusually wide, so role tends to beat matchup more often here than it does at wide receiver.
A flex spot compares players across positions directly on projected points, which is exactly what this tool does: whichever player projects to score more, once matchup, role, and reliability are folded in, is the better start regardless of position. A running back's weekly floor usually comes from touches guaranteed regardless of how the game unfolds, while a receiver's ceiling usually comes from a matchup or a script that favors the pass, so the flex call is often a trade-off between the two rather than a clear edge for either position. When the projections sit close together, the confidence figure and the reliability numbers are the tiebreaker worth trusting over raw upside.
In order
Start with the projection: it already accounts for volume, role, and game script, so it beats a gut feeling about a name you recognize.
Weigh the matchup next, favorable or tough, but treat it as a nudge on a close projection rather than a reason to overturn a clear one.
If your team is favored, lean toward the safer floor between two similar options; if you are the underdog, lean toward the higher ceiling, since a spot start is worth more when you are chasing points than when you are protecting a lead.
Check injury status and weather last, after the numbers, since a limited practice designation or a wind forecast only matters once you know which players were close to begin with.
Never bench a clearly better player over a tough matchup alone; a stud facing a hard matchup is still usually a better start than a replacement-level player facing an easy one.
FAQ
Comparing up to 8 players at once is built into the board above; nothing here requires an account.
Yes. Add up to 8 players to one board and set how many of them you plan to start. The tool ranks the whole group and shows where the close calls sit, alongside the top pick.
It reprices every player under the format set in the site header, including PPR, half PPR, standard, TE premium, and superflex. Connect a Sleeper league from the board and the verdict switches to that league's own literal scoring rules instead of a generic format.
It is the probability that the player you are told to start actually outscores the closest player left on your bench, built from each player's projected points and how much those points tend to vary week to week. A figure near 50 percent means the call is close; one near 100 percent means it is not.
Projections and injury designations refresh once a day. The timestamp shown above the board is the exact time the numbers below it were last pulled.
Yes. Running a comparison costs nothing and does not require an account.
A ranking is a rest-of-season opinion; this verdict is for one week only. A player can sit ahead of another for the rest of the year and still be the worse start in a single week with a tougher matchup or a bye.
Whichever one this tool ranks higher for the week you are setting. Points are compared directly across positions here, which is exactly what a flex decision calls for, and the higher-ranked player is the better start regardless of position.
League Pulse
This tool answers one question at a time: of the players you put in, which ones to start. League Pulse answers a bigger one, your whole starting lineup for the week, filled from your actual Sleeper roster under your league's real scoring.
Start Patrick Mahomes. Mahomes projects 0.1 points clear of Joe Burrow in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Burrow.
Put Mahomes and Burrow on the boardStart Justin Herbert. Herbert projects 0.1 points clear of Jaxson Dart in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Dart.
Check Herbert against DartWorkload settles most running back decisions. Carries plus targets, not yards per carry, is the strongest predictor of a week's points, so the tool weighs a back's expected touch share ahead of anything about breakaway speed. Matchup counts for less here than reputation suggests: a defense that is stout against the run can still give up a pile of points through the passing game, so a back who catches passes keeps a real floor even against a tough front. Goal-line and short-yardage role adds touchdown equity a pure yardage projection misses, which is why work inside the ten is tracked as its own input rather than folded into one blended rate.
Start Saquon Barkley. Barkley projects 0.0 points clear of David Montgomery in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Montgomery.
Full breakdown: Barkley vs MontgomeryStart De'Von Achane. Achane projects 0.1 points clear of Kyren Williams in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Williams.
Put Achane and Williams on the boardStart Bucky Irving. Irving projects 0.1 points clear of Rico Dowdle in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Dowdle.
Check Irving against DowdleStart Mike Evans. Evans projects 0.0 points clear of Malik Nabers in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Nabers.
Full breakdown: Evans vs NabersStart Courtland Sutton. Sutton projects 0.0 points clear of Parker Washington in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Washington.
Put Sutton and Washington on the boardStart Tetairoa McMillan. McMillan projects 0.0 points clear of Malik Nabers in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Nabers.
Check McMillan against NabersStart Tyler Warren. Warren projects 0.0 points clear of Travis Kelce in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Kelce.
Full breakdown: Warren vs KelceStart Kyle Pitts. Pitts projects 0.1 points clear of Dallas Goedert in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Goedert.
Put Pitts and Goedert on the boardStart George Kittle. Kittle projects 0.1 points clear of Colston Loveland in Redraft 1QB PPR, 51 percent to outscore Loveland.
Check Kittle against LovelandDefense and kicker both live and die by game script more than most positions. A defense's points lean heavily on takeaways and touchdowns, among the least predictable events in football, so the matchup, an opponent's turnover rate and offensive line quality, carries more weight here than for an offensive skill position. A kicker's floor is field goal volume, which rises in a game expected to stall in the red zone and falls in one expected to end in touchdowns, so the same game-environment signal that lowers a kicker's outlook often raises the defense's. Both are the most matchup-driven calls on the board and worth checking against the week's projected team totals.
Start Will Reichard. Reichard projects 0.0 points clear of Wil Lutz in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Lutz.
Full breakdown: Reichard vs LutzStart Brandon Aubrey. Aubrey projects 0.0 points clear of Ka'imi Fairbairn in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Fairbairn.
Put Aubrey and Fairbairn on the boardStart Evan McPherson. McPherson projects 0.0 points clear of Jake Bates in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Bates.
Check McPherson against BatesWeek 2, 2026. Projections updated Sep 13, 2026, 8:00 AM EDT.
The verdict
Start Mike Evans. Evans projects 0.0 points clear of Malik Nabers in Redraft 1QB PPR, 50 percent to outscore Nabers.
A horizontally scrolling row of 2 player cards, starters first. Use the "Show as a list" button above to read them stacked instead.
Start this player
WR
SF
opponent (MIA)
Projected points
Redraft 1QB PPR13.7
Floor 7.5,Ceiling 19.9
Matchup
Sit this player
WR
NYG
opponent (LAR)
Projected points
Redraft 1QB PPR13.7
Start this player
WR
SF
opponent (MIA)
Projected points
Redraft 1QB PPR13.7
Each range bar runs from floor to ceiling on one shared scale, 0 to 25 points, so the bars compare across cards.
Value is the player's trade price. This week's points are the projection above.
Win probability: Mike Evans 50 percent, Malik Nabers 50 percent. The two teams are close to even.
Connect a Sleeper league and we will score every player under your league's own rules, then work out how many points each one really adds to your starting lineup.
Same numbers, weighted for the question you are asking.
The next game only: projection, matchup, and whether he is healthy.
Beacon Edge
Weighted for long-term value, age, and market signal
Malik Nabers holds a strong edge on the Beacon Edge, averaged over 15 scored categories weighted for long-term value, age, and market signal. Ranked by composite: Malik Nabers 63%, Mike Evans 37%.
Averaged across 15 scored categories. The table below shows exactly which players and categories moved it.
Every player's share of the weighted average, ranked.
Malik Nabers holds a strong edge on the Beacon Edge, averaged over 15 scored categories weighted for long-term value, age, and market signal. Ranked by composite: Malik Nabers 63%, Mike Evans 37%.
Game environment
Beat rate
16%
Availability
100%
Recent form
Last 1 week, 2026
Met or beat the projection in 1 of 1 graded week.
| Week | 1 |
|---|---|
| Scored | 16.9 |
| Projected | 12.8 |
Value (FF Beacon)
4,333
Overall rank
#59
Floor 2.8,Ceiling 24.6
Matchup
Game environment
Beat rate
34%
Availability
100%
Recent form
Not enough graded weeks to chart yet.
Questionable
Value (FF Beacon)
6,761
Overall rank
#23
Floor 7.5,Ceiling 19.9
Matchup
Game environment
Beat rate
16%
Availability
100%
Recent form
Last 1 week, 2026
Met or beat the projection in 1 of 1 graded week.
| Week | 1 |
|---|---|
| Scored | 16.9 |
| Projected | 12.8 |
Value (FF Beacon)
4,333
Overall rank
#59
Sit this player
WR
NYG
opponent (LAR)
Projected points
Redraft 1QB PPR13.7
Floor 2.8,Ceiling 24.6
Matchup
Game environment
Beat rate
34%
Availability
100%
Recent form
Not enough graded weeks to chart yet.
Questionable
Value (FF Beacon)
6,761
Overall rank
#23
| Player | Composite |
|---|---|
| Malik Nabers (leader) | 63% |
| Mike Evans | 37% |
Each bar is how far that category moved the meter, in percentage points. They add up to the split above.
Each category's pull toward Mike Evans or Malik Nabers, in percentage points. Totals: Mike Evans 2.9 points, Malik Nabers 16.2 points, for a final split of 37 to 63.
FF Beacon Value
Weighted at 28% of this lens
FF Beacon Value: favors Malik Nabers by 3.0 percentage points, carrying 28 percent of the weight.
Recent Production
Weighted at 5% of this lens
Recent Production: favors Mike Evans by 2.4 percentage points, carrying 5 percent of the weight.
Upside
Weighted at 10% of this lens
Upside: favors Malik Nabers by 0.8 percentage points, carrying 10 percent of the weight.
30-Day Trend
Weighted at 7% of this lens
30-Day Trend: favors Mike Evans by 0.5 percentage points, carrying 7 percent of the weight.
Overall Rank
Weighted at 9% of this lens
Overall Rank: favors Malik Nabers by 1.9 percentage points, carrying 9 percent of the weight.
Risk Level
Weighted at 5% of this lens
Risk Level: favors Malik Nabers by 0.8 percentage points, carrying 5 percent of the weight.
Positional Rank
Weighted at 7% of this lens
Positional Rank: favors Malik Nabers by 1.7 percentage points, carrying 7 percent of the weight.
Beat Rate
Weighted at 2% of this lens
Beat Rate: favors Malik Nabers by 0.3 percentage points, carrying 2 percent of the weight.
Age & Long-Term Appeal
Weighted at 16% of this lens
Age & Long-Term Appeal: favors Malik Nabers by 7.8 percentage points, carrying 16 percent of the weight.
Totals: Mike Evans 2.9 points, Malik Nabers 16.2 points, for a final split of 37 to 63. 6 further categories scored too close to move the result.
| Category | Weight | Favors | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| FF Beacon Value | 28% | Malik Nabers | 3.0 |
| Recent Production | 5% | Mike Evans | 2.4 |
| Upside | 10% | Malik Nabers | 0.8 |
| 30-Day Trend | 7% | Mike Evans | 0.5 |
| Overall Rank | 9% | Malik Nabers | 1.9 |
| Risk Level | 5% | Malik Nabers | 0.8 |
| Positional Rank | 7% | Malik Nabers | 1.7 |
| Category | Mike Evans | Malik Nabers |
|---|---|---|
| FF Beacon Value Current market value on the trusted FF Beacon scale for this format. Counts 28% toward the verdict for this lens | Mike Evans: 4,333 | Malik Nabers: 6,761 Best |
| Overall Rank Where each player sits among every player at every position. Counts 9% toward the verdict for this lens | Mike Evans: #59 Up 34 in 30 days | Malik Nabers: #23 BestDown 2 in 30 days |
| Positional Rank Rank within their own position group. Counts 7% toward the verdict for this lens | Mike Evans: WR26 Tier 2 | Malik Nabers: WR9 BestTier 1 |
| 30-Day Trend How each player's value has moved over the last month. Counts 7% toward the verdict for this lens | Mike Evans: +35.3% BestRange 3,159 to 4,333 | Malik Nabers: +3.8% Range 6,070 to 6,849 |
| Recent Production Most recent full-season finish within their position by fantasy points. Counts 5% toward the verdict for this lens | Mike Evans: WR3 (2026) BestBefore that: WR75, WR14 | Malik Nabers: WR102 (2025) Before that: WR6 |
| Opportunity Role on their team's depth chart, a proxy for expected volume. Counts 3% toward the verdict for this lens Even | Mike Evans: Starter Depth chart slot 1 | Malik Nabers: Starter Depth chart slot 1 |
| Health Current injury designation, which decides whether he can help you at all. Counts 1% toward the verdict for this lens | Mike Evans: Healthy Best | Malik Nabers: Questionable |
| Rest-of-Season Points Projected fantasy points across every remaining game, adjusted for matchups and reliability. Counts 3% toward the verdict for this lens | Mike Evans: 199.5 16 games left | Malik Nabers: 218.3 Best16 games left |
| Projected Per Game Average projected points in each remaining game. Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens | Mike Evans: 12.5 Range 11.1 to 13.9 | Malik Nabers: 13.6 BestRange 10.9 to 16.4 |
| Next Game Projected points in the very next game we have a projection for. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Mike Evans: 13.7 Week 2 vs MIA | Malik Nabers: 12.3 Week 2 vs LAR |
| Next Matchup How generous the next opponent has been to this position, from our own defensive splits. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Mike Evans: Neutral vs MIA, 1.00x | Malik Nabers: Neutral vs LAR, 1.00x |
| Remaining Schedule Average matchup difficulty across every game left, from our own defensive splits. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Mike Evans: Neutral 1.00x average | Malik Nabers: Neutral 1.00x average |
| Beat Rate How often he meets or beats his own weekly projection. Weeks he was projected for but missed count against him. Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens | Mike Evans: 16% 20 graded games | Malik Nabers: 34% Best16 graded games |
| Availability Share of the weeks he was projected for that he actually played. Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens Even | Mike Evans: 100% | Malik Nabers: 100% |
| Week-to-Week Consistency How much his weekly score bounces around his projection. Steadier is better for setting a lineup. Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens | Mike Evans: Steady BestSpread 0.45 | Malik Nabers: Swingy Spread 0.79 |
| Age & Long-Term Appeal Younger players hold value longer in dynasty formats. Counts 16% toward the verdict for this lens | Mike Evans: 33.1 yrs Year 13 | Malik Nabers: 23.1 yrs BestYear 3 |
| Risk Level Lower-risk profiles combine a steady weekly score, a proven tier, and prime age. Counts 5% toward the verdict for this lens | Mike Evans: Steady | Malik Nabers: Swingy Best |
| Upside Room to climb, blending recent momentum, youth, and tier. Counts 10% toward the verdict for this lens | Mike Evans: Trending up | Malik Nabers: Breakout arrow Best |
| Dynasty Outlook A plain-language read blending market value with age. Shown for context; its inputs are already scored above, so it does not count twice. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Mike Evans: Win-now asset Age 33.1 | Malik Nabers: Cornerstone Age 23.1 |
| Redraft Outlook A plain-language read blending rank with recent production. Shown for context; its inputs are already scored above. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Mike Evans: Weekly starter | Malik Nabers: Weekly starter |
FF Beacon Value
Current market value on the trusted FF Beacon scale for this format.
Counts 28% toward the verdict for this lens
Mike Evans
4,333
Malik Nabers
6,761
BestOverall Rank
Where each player sits among every player at every position.
Counts 9% toward the verdict for this lens
Mike Evans
#59
Up 34 in 30 days
Malik Nabers
#23
BestThe plain-English answers, no table-reading required.
Best overall
Malik Nabers takes 63% of the composite for dynasty value.
What is driving it
Malik Nabers leads on ff beacon value and age & long-term appeal.
Safer floor
Mike Evans is the steadiest weekly hold, carrying 2% of the dynasty value composite.
Higher upside
Malik Nabers has the most room to climb from here.
Best trade target
Malik Nabers carries the strongest current value.
Beacon Edge
Weighted for rest-of-season projection, production, and reliability
Malik Nabers holds a slight edge on the Beacon Edge, averaged over 17 scored categories weighted for rest-of-season projection, production, and reliability. Ranked by composite: Malik Nabers 52%, Mike Evans 48%.
Averaged across 17 scored categories. The table below shows exactly which players and categories moved it.
Every player's share of the weighted average, ranked.
Malik Nabers holds a slight edge on the Beacon Edge, averaged over 17 scored categories weighted for rest-of-season projection, production, and reliability. Ranked by composite: Malik Nabers 52%, Mike Evans 48%.
| Player | Composite |
|---|---|
| Malik Nabers (leader) | 52% |
| Mike Evans | 48% |
Each bar is how far that category moved the meter, in percentage points. They add up to the split above.
Each category's pull toward Mike Evans or Malik Nabers, in percentage points. Totals: Mike Evans 4.6 points, Malik Nabers 6.5 points, for a final split of 48 to 52.
Rest-of-Season Points
Weighted at 19% of this lens
Rest-of-Season Points: favors Malik Nabers by 0.4 percentage points, carrying 19 percent of the weight.
Recent Production
Weighted at 8% of this lens
Recent Production: favors Mike Evans by 3.8 percentage points, carrying 8 percent of the weight.
Overall Rank
Weighted at 11% of this lens
Overall Rank: favors Malik Nabers by 2.5 percentage points, carrying 11 percent of the weight.
| Category | Mike Evans | Malik Nabers |
|---|---|---|
| FF Beacon Value Current market value on the trusted FF Beacon scale for this format. Counts 6% toward the verdict for this lens | Mike Evans: 4,333 | Malik Nabers: 6,761 Best |
| Overall Rank Where each player sits among every player at every position. Counts 11% toward the verdict for this lens |
The plain-English answers, no table-reading required.
Best overall
Malik Nabers takes 52% of the composite for the rest of this season.
What is driving it
Malik Nabers leads on rest-of-season points and overall rank.
Beacon Edge
Weighted for next game's projection, matchup, and health
The Beacon Edge is a toss-up among the top players, averaged over 7 scored categories weighted for next game's projection, matchup, and health. Ranked by composite: Mike Evans 50%, Malik Nabers 50%.
These players grade out nearly even across every category we can measure. The edge is small enough that your roster needs should decide it.
Every player's share of the weighted average, ranked.
The Beacon Edge is a toss-up among the top players, averaged over 7 scored categories weighted for next game's projection, matchup, and health. Ranked by composite: Mike Evans 50%, Malik Nabers 50%.
| Player | Composite |
|---|---|
| Mike Evans | 50% |
| Malik Nabers | 50% |
Each bar is how far that category moved the meter, in percentage points. They add up to the split above.
Each category's pull toward Mike Evans or Malik Nabers, in percentage points. Totals: Mike Evans 2.7 points, Malik Nabers 2.6 points, for a final split of 50 to 50.
Next Game
Weighted at 34% of this lens
Next Game: favors Mike Evans by 0.9 percentage points, carrying 34 percent of the weight.
Week-to-Week Consistency
Weighted at 10% of this lens
Week-to-Week Consistency: favors Mike Evans by 1.1 percentage points, carrying 10 percent of the weight.
Health
Weighted at 10% of this lens
Health: favors Mike Evans by 0.7 percentage points, carrying 10 percent of the weight.
| Category | Mike Evans | Malik Nabers |
|---|---|---|
| FF Beacon Value Current market value on the trusted FF Beacon scale for this format. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Mike Evans: 4,333 | Malik Nabers: 6,761 |
| Overall Rank Where each player sits among every player at every position. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Mike Evans: #59 |
The plain-English answers, no table-reading required.
Best overall
This group grades out nearly even for this week.
Safer floor
Mike Evans is the steadiest weekly hold, carrying 10% of the this week composite.
Every remaining game, projected and matchup-adjusted.
Mike Evans
Range 177 to 222 points. Schedule: neutral.
Malik Nabers
Range 175 to 262 points. Schedule: neutral.
Players with the same total can get there very differently. This is the shape.
Weekly projected points from week 2 to week 18. Mike Evans totals 200 points, Malik Nabers totals 218 points.
How generous each upcoming defense has been to this position, from our own splits going back to 2020. Above 1.00 helps the player.
Mike Evans has a neutral at 1.00 times average. Malik Nabers has a neutral at 1.00 times average.
Mike EvansNeutral
The band is one standard deviation either side, built from how much this player's own weekly scores actually bounce around, not a flat percentage.
Mike Evans projects for 200 points, in a range from 177 to 222. Malik Nabers projects for 218 points, in a range from 175 to 262.
Mike Evans
177 to 222 pts
Malik Nabers
175 to 262 pts
| Player | Floor | Projection | Ceiling |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Evans | 177 | 200 | 222 |
| Malik Nabers | 175 |
Projections start from Sleeper's weekly numbers and are then adjusted by our own model for how generous each opponent has been to the position, how reliably the player has hit the projection, how often the player has been available, and any current injury designation. This is the same model behind Power Pulse and the FAAB calculator.
Measured against each player's own weekly projections, not against each other.
Mike Evans
From 20 graded games across 20 projected weeks.
Malik Nabers
From 16 graded games across 16 projected weeks.
One mark per graded game in the 2026 season, placed by how far above or below projection the player finished. A tight cluster near the middle line is a player you can set and forget. The tiles above cover every season we have graded, so their game counts are higher.
Mike Evans finished above projection in 1 of 1 graded games, averaging plus 4.1 points.
| Player | Week | Projected | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Evans | 1 | 12.8 | 16.9 | +4.1 |
| Mike Evans | 2 | 13.8 | Did not play | - |
| Mike Evans | 3 | 12.9 |
Every projected week of the 2026 season sorted by how the real game compared. Two players with the same average can live in completely different bars.
Mike Evans: 1 boom, 0 about right, 0 bust, 16 missed, out of 17 projected weeks. Malik Nabers: 0 boom, 0 about right, 0 bust, 17 missed, out of 17 projected weeks.
Mike Evans
Boom 1, Did not play 16
Malik Nabers
Did not play 17
| Player | Boom |
|---|
A week a player was projected for but did not play counts as a miss, not as a week that never happened. Recent seasons count for far more than old ones, because roles and offenses change year to year. Both are deliberate: they make the number lower and more honest than a raw hit rate.
Draft price, value history, and the trades people actually made.
Mike Evans
Sleeper PPR ADP
up 34 in 30d
Value volatility over 30 days: 309.5.
Mike Evans is going about where we rank that player.
Rounds assume 12 teams.
Malik Nabers
Sleeper PPR ADP
down 2 in 30d
Value volatility over 30 days: 153.0.
Malik Nabers is going about where we rank that player.
Rounds assume 12 teams.
Redraft 1QB PPR, FF Beacon. Every player on one axis, so the shapes are directly comparable.
Mike Evans went from 3,099 to 4,333, up 1,234. Malik Nabers went from 7,130 to 6,761, down 369
Actual deals from leagues synced through League Pulse. What people paid, not what a calculator says they should have.
Dynasty PPR 1QB TEP
Sep 7, 2026
Regular-season totals, side by side. Best marks the top number in each row.
Overview
| Stat | Mike Evans | Malik Nabers |
|---|---|---|
| Games played | 1 Best | - |
| Total yards | 49 Best | - |
| Scrimmage yards | 49 Best | - |
| Total TDs | 1 Best | - |
| Fantasy points (PPR) | 16.9 Best | - |
| PPR per game | 16.9 Best | - |
Receiving
| Stat | Mike Evans | Malik Nabers |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 7 Best | - |
| Receptions | 6 Best | - |
| Catch % | 85.7% Best | - |
| Receiving yards | 49 Best | - |
| Receiving TDs | 1 Best | - |
| Yards / catch | 8.2 Best | - |
| Yards / target | 7.0 Best | - |
One stat, week by week, for every player.
| Week | Mike Evans | Malik Nabers |
|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | 49 Bestvs LAR | - |
Real trades are rarely one player for one player. If these players are only part of a bigger deal, build the whole thing in the Signal Check trade calculator: it prices multi-player packages and draft picks together and grades the trade end to end.
Build the full trade in the Signal Check Trade Calculator| Beat Rate | 2% | Malik Nabers | 0.3 |
| Age & Long-Term Appeal | 16% | Malik Nabers | 7.8 |
Down 2 in 30 days
Positional Rank
Rank within their own position group.
Counts 7% toward the verdict for this lens
Mike Evans
WR26
Tier 2
Malik Nabers
WR9
BestTier 1
30-Day Trend
How each player's value has moved over the last month.
Counts 7% toward the verdict for this lens
Mike Evans
+35.3%
BestRange 3,159 to 4,333
Malik Nabers
+3.8%
Range 6,070 to 6,849
Recent Production
Most recent full-season finish within their position by fantasy points.
Counts 5% toward the verdict for this lens
Mike Evans
WR3 (2026)
BestBefore that: WR75, WR14
Malik Nabers
WR102 (2025)
Before that: WR6
Opportunity
Role on their team's depth chart, a proxy for expected volume.
Counts 3% toward the verdict for this lens
Even
Mike Evans
Starter
Depth chart slot 1
Malik Nabers
Starter
Depth chart slot 1
Health
Current injury designation, which decides whether he can help you at all.
Counts 1% toward the verdict for this lens
Mike Evans
Healthy
BestMalik Nabers
Questionable
Rest-of-Season Points
Projected fantasy points across every remaining game, adjusted for matchups and reliability.
Counts 3% toward the verdict for this lens
Mike Evans
199.5
16 games left
Malik Nabers
218.3
Best16 games left
Projected Per Game
Average projected points in each remaining game.
Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens
Mike Evans
12.5
Range 11.1 to 13.9
Malik Nabers
13.6
BestRange 10.9 to 16.4
Next Game
Projected points in the very next game we have a projection for.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Mike Evans
13.7
Week 2 vs MIA
Malik Nabers
12.3
Week 2 vs LAR
Next Matchup
How generous the next opponent has been to this position, from our own defensive splits.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Mike Evans
Neutral
vs MIA, 1.00x
Malik Nabers
Neutral
vs LAR, 1.00x
Remaining Schedule
Average matchup difficulty across every game left, from our own defensive splits.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Mike Evans
Neutral
1.00x average
Malik Nabers
Neutral
1.00x average
Beat Rate
How often he meets or beats his own weekly projection. Weeks he was projected for but missed count against him.
Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens
Mike Evans
16%
20 graded games
Malik Nabers
34%
Best16 graded games
Availability
Share of the weeks he was projected for that he actually played.
Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens
Even
Mike Evans
100%
Malik Nabers
100%
Week-to-Week Consistency
How much his weekly score bounces around his projection. Steadier is better for setting a lineup.
Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens
Mike Evans
Steady
BestSpread 0.45
Malik Nabers
Swingy
Spread 0.79
Age & Long-Term Appeal
Younger players hold value longer in dynasty formats.
Counts 16% toward the verdict for this lens
Mike Evans
33.1 yrs
Year 13
Malik Nabers
23.1 yrs
BestYear 3
Risk Level
Lower-risk profiles combine a steady weekly score, a proven tier, and prime age.
Counts 5% toward the verdict for this lens
Mike Evans
Steady
Malik Nabers
Swingy
BestUpside
Room to climb, blending recent momentum, youth, and tier.
Counts 10% toward the verdict for this lens
Mike Evans
Trending up
Malik Nabers
Breakout arrow
BestDynasty Outlook
A plain-language read blending market value with age. Shown for context; its inputs are already scored above, so it does not count twice.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Mike Evans
Win-now asset
Age 33.1
Malik Nabers
Cornerstone
Age 23.1
Redraft Outlook
A plain-language read blending rank with recent production. Shown for context; its inputs are already scored above.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Mike Evans
Weekly starter
Malik Nabers
Weekly starter
Week-to-Week Consistency
Weighted at 5% of this lens
Week-to-Week Consistency: favors Mike Evans by 0.6 percentage points, carrying 5 percent of the weight.
Beat Rate
Weighted at 8% of this lens
Beat Rate: favors Malik Nabers by 1.5 percentage points, carrying 8 percent of the weight.
FF Beacon Value
Weighted at 6% of this lens
FF Beacon Value: favors Malik Nabers by 0.7 percentage points, carrying 6 percent of the weight.
Health
Weighted at 3% of this lens
Health: favors Mike Evans by 0.2 percentage points, carrying 3 percent of the weight.
Positional Rank
Weighted at 5% of this lens
Positional Rank: favors Malik Nabers by 1.2 percentage points, carrying 5 percent of the weight.
Risk Level
Weighted at 2% of this lens
Risk Level: favors Malik Nabers by 0.2 percentage points, carrying 2 percent of the weight.
Totals: Mike Evans 4.6 points, Malik Nabers 6.5 points, for a final split of 48 to 52. 8 further categories scored too close to move the result.
| Category | Weight | Favors | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rest-of-Season Points | 19% | Malik Nabers | 0.4 |
| Recent Production | 8% | Mike Evans | 3.8 |
| Overall Rank | 11% | Malik Nabers | 2.5 |
| Week-to-Week Consistency | 5% | Mike Evans | 0.6 |
| Beat Rate | 8% | Malik Nabers | 1.5 |
| FF Beacon Value | 6% | Malik Nabers | 0.7 |
| Health | 3% | Mike Evans | 0.2 |
| Positional Rank | 5% | Malik Nabers | 1.2 |
| Risk Level | 2% | Malik Nabers | 0.2 |
Mike Evans: #59 Up 34 in 30 days |
Malik Nabers: #23 BestDown 2 in 30 days |
| Positional Rank Rank within their own position group. Counts 5% toward the verdict for this lens | Mike Evans: WR26 Tier 2 | Malik Nabers: WR9 BestTier 1 |
|---|
| 30-Day Trend How each player's value has moved over the last month. Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens | Mike Evans: +35.3% BestRange 3,159 to 4,333 | Malik Nabers: +3.8% Range 6,070 to 6,849 |
|---|
| Recent Production Most recent full-season finish within their position by fantasy points. Counts 8% toward the verdict for this lens | Mike Evans: WR3 (2026) BestBefore that: WR75, WR14 | Malik Nabers: WR102 (2025) Before that: WR6 |
|---|
| Opportunity Role on their team's depth chart, a proxy for expected volume. Counts 6% toward the verdict for this lens Even | Mike Evans: Starter Depth chart slot 1 | Malik Nabers: Starter Depth chart slot 1 |
|---|
| Health Current injury designation, which decides whether he can help you at all. Counts 3% toward the verdict for this lens | Mike Evans: Healthy Best | Malik Nabers: Questionable |
|---|
| Rest-of-Season Points Projected fantasy points across every remaining game, adjusted for matchups and reliability. Counts 19% toward the verdict for this lens | Mike Evans: 199.5 16 games left | Malik Nabers: 218.3 Best16 games left |
|---|
| Projected Per Game Average projected points in each remaining game. Counts 8% toward the verdict for this lens | Mike Evans: 12.5 Range 11.1 to 13.9 | Malik Nabers: 13.6 BestRange 10.9 to 16.4 |
|---|
| Next Game Projected points in the very next game we have a projection for. Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens | Mike Evans: 13.7 BestWeek 2 vs MIA | Malik Nabers: 12.3 Week 2 vs LAR |
|---|
| Next Matchup How generous the next opponent has been to this position, from our own defensive splits. Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens Even | Mike Evans: Neutral vs MIA, 1.00x | Malik Nabers: Neutral vs LAR, 1.00x |
|---|
| Remaining Schedule Average matchup difficulty across every game left, from our own defensive splits. Counts 5% toward the verdict for this lens Even | Mike Evans: Neutral 1.00x average | Malik Nabers: Neutral 1.00x average |
|---|
| Beat Rate How often he meets or beats his own weekly projection. Weeks he was projected for but missed count against him. Counts 8% toward the verdict for this lens | Mike Evans: 16% 20 graded games | Malik Nabers: 34% Best16 graded games |
|---|
| Availability Share of the weeks he was projected for that he actually played. Counts 6% toward the verdict for this lens Even | Mike Evans: 100% | Malik Nabers: 100% |
|---|
| Week-to-Week Consistency How much his weekly score bounces around his projection. Steadier is better for setting a lineup. Counts 5% toward the verdict for this lens | Mike Evans: Steady BestSpread 0.45 | Malik Nabers: Swingy Spread 0.79 |
|---|
| Age & Long-Term Appeal Younger players hold value longer in dynasty formats. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Mike Evans: 33.1 yrs Year 13 | Malik Nabers: 23.1 yrs Year 3 |
|---|
| Risk Level Lower-risk profiles combine a steady weekly score, a proven tier, and prime age. Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens | Mike Evans: Steady | Malik Nabers: Swingy Best |
|---|
| Upside Room to climb, blending recent momentum, youth, and tier. Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens | Mike Evans: Trending up | Malik Nabers: Breakout arrow Best |
|---|
| Dynasty Outlook A plain-language read blending market value with age. Shown for context; its inputs are already scored above, so it does not count twice. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Mike Evans: Win-now asset Age 33.1 | Malik Nabers: Cornerstone Age 23.1 |
|---|
| Redraft Outlook A plain-language read blending rank with recent production. Shown for context; its inputs are already scored above. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Mike Evans: Weekly starter | Malik Nabers: Weekly starter |
|---|
FF Beacon Value
Current market value on the trusted FF Beacon scale for this format.
Counts 6% toward the verdict for this lens
Mike Evans
4,333
Malik Nabers
6,761
BestOverall Rank
Where each player sits among every player at every position.
Counts 11% toward the verdict for this lens
Mike Evans
#59
Up 34 in 30 days
Malik Nabers
#23
BestDown 2 in 30 days
Positional Rank
Rank within their own position group.
Counts 5% toward the verdict for this lens
Mike Evans
WR26
Tier 2
Malik Nabers
WR9
BestTier 1
30-Day Trend
How each player's value has moved over the last month.
Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens
Mike Evans
+35.3%
BestRange 3,159 to 4,333
Malik Nabers
+3.8%
Range 6,070 to 6,849
Recent Production
Most recent full-season finish within their position by fantasy points.
Counts 8% toward the verdict for this lens
Mike Evans
WR3 (2026)
BestBefore that: WR75, WR14
Malik Nabers
WR102 (2025)
Before that: WR6
Opportunity
Role on their team's depth chart, a proxy for expected volume.
Counts 6% toward the verdict for this lens
Even
Mike Evans
Starter
Depth chart slot 1
Malik Nabers
Starter
Depth chart slot 1
Health
Current injury designation, which decides whether he can help you at all.
Counts 3% toward the verdict for this lens
Mike Evans
Healthy
BestMalik Nabers
Questionable
Rest-of-Season Points
Projected fantasy points across every remaining game, adjusted for matchups and reliability.
Counts 19% toward the verdict for this lens
Mike Evans
199.5
16 games left
Malik Nabers
218.3
Best16 games left
Projected Per Game
Average projected points in each remaining game.
Counts 8% toward the verdict for this lens
Mike Evans
12.5
Range 11.1 to 13.9
Malik Nabers
13.6
BestRange 10.9 to 16.4
Next Game
Projected points in the very next game we have a projection for.
Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens
Mike Evans
13.7
BestWeek 2 vs MIA
Malik Nabers
12.3
Week 2 vs LAR
Next Matchup
How generous the next opponent has been to this position, from our own defensive splits.
Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens
Even
Mike Evans
Neutral
vs MIA, 1.00x
Malik Nabers
Neutral
vs LAR, 1.00x
Remaining Schedule
Average matchup difficulty across every game left, from our own defensive splits.
Counts 5% toward the verdict for this lens
Even
Mike Evans
Neutral
1.00x average
Malik Nabers
Neutral
1.00x average
Beat Rate
How often he meets or beats his own weekly projection. Weeks he was projected for but missed count against him.
Counts 8% toward the verdict for this lens
Mike Evans
16%
20 graded games
Malik Nabers
34%
Best16 graded games
Availability
Share of the weeks he was projected for that he actually played.
Counts 6% toward the verdict for this lens
Even
Mike Evans
100%
Malik Nabers
100%
Week-to-Week Consistency
How much his weekly score bounces around his projection. Steadier is better for setting a lineup.
Counts 5% toward the verdict for this lens
Mike Evans
Steady
BestSpread 0.45
Malik Nabers
Swingy
Spread 0.79
Age & Long-Term Appeal
Younger players hold value longer in dynasty formats.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Mike Evans
33.1 yrs
Year 13
Malik Nabers
23.1 yrs
Year 3
Risk Level
Lower-risk profiles combine a steady weekly score, a proven tier, and prime age.
Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens
Mike Evans
Steady
Malik Nabers
Swingy
BestUpside
Room to climb, blending recent momentum, youth, and tier.
Counts 2% toward the verdict for this lens
Mike Evans
Trending up
Malik Nabers
Breakout arrow
BestDynasty Outlook
A plain-language read blending market value with age. Shown for context; its inputs are already scored above, so it does not count twice.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Mike Evans
Win-now asset
Age 33.1
Malik Nabers
Cornerstone
Age 23.1
Redraft Outlook
A plain-language read blending rank with recent production. Shown for context; its inputs are already scored above.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Mike Evans
Weekly starter
Malik Nabers
Weekly starter
Safer floor
Mike Evans is the steadiest weekly hold, carrying 5% of the the rest of this season composite.
Higher upside
Malik Nabers has the most room to climb from here.
Best trade target
Malik Nabers carries the strongest current value.
Beat Rate
Weighted at 14% of this lens
Beat Rate: favors Malik Nabers by 2.6 percentage points, carrying 14 percent of the weight.
Totals: Mike Evans 2.7 points, Malik Nabers 2.6 points, for a final split of 50 to 50. 3 further categories scored too close to move the result.
| Category | Weight | Favors | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Game | 34% | Mike Evans | 0.9 |
| Week-to-Week Consistency | 10% | Mike Evans | 1.1 |
| Health | 10% | Mike Evans | 0.7 |
| Beat Rate | 14% | Malik Nabers | 2.6 |
Up 34 in 30 days
Malik Nabers: #23 Down 2 in 30 days |
| Positional Rank Rank within their own position group. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Mike Evans: WR26 Tier 2 | Malik Nabers: WR9 Tier 1 |
|---|
| 30-Day Trend How each player's value has moved over the last month. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Mike Evans: +35.3% Range 3,159 to 4,333 | Malik Nabers: +3.8% Range 6,070 to 6,849 |
|---|
| Recent Production Most recent full-season finish within their position by fantasy points. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Mike Evans: WR3 (2026) Before that: WR75, WR14 | Malik Nabers: WR102 (2025) Before that: WR6 |
|---|
| Opportunity Role on their team's depth chart, a proxy for expected volume. Counts 12% toward the verdict for this lens Even | Mike Evans: Starter Depth chart slot 1 | Malik Nabers: Starter Depth chart slot 1 |
|---|
| Health Current injury designation, which decides whether he can help you at all. Counts 10% toward the verdict for this lens | Mike Evans: Healthy Best | Malik Nabers: Questionable |
|---|
| Rest-of-Season Points Projected fantasy points across every remaining game, adjusted for matchups and reliability. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Mike Evans: 199.5 16 games left | Malik Nabers: 218.3 16 games left |
|---|
| Projected Per Game Average projected points in each remaining game. Counts 4% toward the verdict for this lens | Mike Evans: 12.5 Range 11.1 to 13.9 | Malik Nabers: 13.6 BestRange 10.9 to 16.4 |
|---|
| Next Game Projected points in the very next game we have a projection for. Counts 34% toward the verdict for this lens | Mike Evans: 13.7 BestWeek 2 vs MIA | Malik Nabers: 12.3 Week 2 vs LAR |
|---|
| Next Matchup How generous the next opponent has been to this position, from our own defensive splits. Counts 16% toward the verdict for this lens Even | Mike Evans: Neutral vs MIA, 1.00x | Malik Nabers: Neutral vs LAR, 1.00x |
|---|
| Remaining Schedule Average matchup difficulty across every game left, from our own defensive splits. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Mike Evans: Neutral 1.00x average | Malik Nabers: Neutral 1.00x average |
|---|
| Beat Rate How often he meets or beats his own weekly projection. Weeks he was projected for but missed count against him. Counts 14% toward the verdict for this lens | Mike Evans: 16% 20 graded games | Malik Nabers: 34% Best16 graded games |
|---|
| Availability Share of the weeks he was projected for that he actually played. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Mike Evans: 100% | Malik Nabers: 100% |
|---|
| Week-to-Week Consistency How much his weekly score bounces around his projection. Steadier is better for setting a lineup. Counts 10% toward the verdict for this lens | Mike Evans: Steady BestSpread 0.45 | Malik Nabers: Swingy Spread 0.79 |
|---|
| Age & Long-Term Appeal Younger players hold value longer in dynasty formats. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Mike Evans: 33.1 yrs Year 13 | Malik Nabers: 23.1 yrs Year 3 |
|---|
| Risk Level Lower-risk profiles combine a steady weekly score, a proven tier, and prime age. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Mike Evans: Steady | Malik Nabers: Swingy |
|---|
| Upside Room to climb, blending recent momentum, youth, and tier. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Mike Evans: Trending up | Malik Nabers: Breakout arrow |
|---|
| Dynasty Outlook A plain-language read blending market value with age. Shown for context; its inputs are already scored above, so it does not count twice. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Mike Evans: Win-now asset Age 33.1 | Malik Nabers: Cornerstone Age 23.1 |
|---|
| Redraft Outlook A plain-language read blending rank with recent production. Shown for context; its inputs are already scored above. Context only, not counted toward the verdict | Mike Evans: Weekly starter | Malik Nabers: Weekly starter |
|---|
FF Beacon Value
Current market value on the trusted FF Beacon scale for this format.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Mike Evans
4,333
Malik Nabers
6,761
Overall Rank
Where each player sits among every player at every position.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Mike Evans
#59
Up 34 in 30 days
Malik Nabers
#23
Down 2 in 30 days
Positional Rank
Rank within their own position group.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Mike Evans
WR26
Tier 2
Malik Nabers
WR9
Tier 1
30-Day Trend
How each player's value has moved over the last month.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Mike Evans
+35.3%
Range 3,159 to 4,333
Malik Nabers
+3.8%
Range 6,070 to 6,849
Recent Production
Most recent full-season finish within their position by fantasy points.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Mike Evans
WR3 (2026)
Before that: WR75, WR14
Malik Nabers
WR102 (2025)
Before that: WR6
Opportunity
Role on their team's depth chart, a proxy for expected volume.
Counts 12% toward the verdict for this lens
Even
Mike Evans
Starter
Depth chart slot 1
Malik Nabers
Starter
Depth chart slot 1
Health
Current injury designation, which decides whether he can help you at all.
Counts 10% toward the verdict for this lens
Mike Evans
Healthy
BestMalik Nabers
Questionable
Rest-of-Season Points
Projected fantasy points across every remaining game, adjusted for matchups and reliability.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Mike Evans
199.5
16 games left
Malik Nabers
218.3
16 games left
Projected Per Game
Average projected points in each remaining game.
Counts 4% toward the verdict for this lens
Mike Evans
12.5
Range 11.1 to 13.9
Malik Nabers
13.6
BestRange 10.9 to 16.4
Next Game
Projected points in the very next game we have a projection for.
Counts 34% toward the verdict for this lens
Mike Evans
13.7
BestWeek 2 vs MIA
Malik Nabers
12.3
Week 2 vs LAR
Next Matchup
How generous the next opponent has been to this position, from our own defensive splits.
Counts 16% toward the verdict for this lens
Even
Mike Evans
Neutral
vs MIA, 1.00x
Malik Nabers
Neutral
vs LAR, 1.00x
Remaining Schedule
Average matchup difficulty across every game left, from our own defensive splits.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Mike Evans
Neutral
1.00x average
Malik Nabers
Neutral
1.00x average
Beat Rate
How often he meets or beats his own weekly projection. Weeks he was projected for but missed count against him.
Counts 14% toward the verdict for this lens
Mike Evans
16%
20 graded games
Malik Nabers
34%
Best16 graded games
Availability
Share of the weeks he was projected for that he actually played.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Mike Evans
100%
Malik Nabers
100%
Week-to-Week Consistency
How much his weekly score bounces around his projection. Steadier is better for setting a lineup.
Counts 10% toward the verdict for this lens
Mike Evans
Steady
BestSpread 0.45
Malik Nabers
Swingy
Spread 0.79
Age & Long-Term Appeal
Younger players hold value longer in dynasty formats.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Mike Evans
33.1 yrs
Year 13
Malik Nabers
23.1 yrs
Year 3
Risk Level
Lower-risk profiles combine a steady weekly score, a proven tier, and prime age.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Mike Evans
Steady
Malik Nabers
Swingy
Upside
Room to climb, blending recent momentum, youth, and tier.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Mike Evans
Trending up
Malik Nabers
Breakout arrow
Dynasty Outlook
A plain-language read blending market value with age. Shown for context; its inputs are already scored above, so it does not count twice.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Mike Evans
Win-now asset
Age 33.1
Malik Nabers
Cornerstone
Age 23.1
Redraft Outlook
A plain-language read blending rank with recent production. Shown for context; its inputs are already scored above.
Context only, not counted toward the verdict
Mike Evans
Weekly starter
Malik Nabers
Weekly starter
| Week | Mike Evans | Opponent | Malik Nabers | Opponent |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 13.7 | MIA | 12.3 | LAR |
| 3 | 12.8 | ARI | 15.2 | TEN |
| 4 | 10.9 | DEN | 13.7 | ARI |
| 5 | 11.4 | SEA | 15.8 | WAS |
| 6 | 14.4 | WAS | 14.0 | NO |
| 7 | 12.8 | ATL | 12.5 | HOU |
| 9 | 12.6 | LV | 11.8 | PHI |
| 10 | 14.4 | DAL | 15.8 | WAS |
| 11 | 12.0 | MIN | 12.4 | JAX |
| 12 | 11.4 | SEA | 13.9 | IND |
| 13 | 12.2 | NYG | 14.1 | SF |
| 14 | 12.8 | LAR | 12.0 | SEA |
| 15 | 11.7 | LAC | 13.6 | CLE |
| 16 | 12.5 | KC | 13.7 | DET |
| 17 | 11.2 | PHI | 15.7 | DAL |
| 18 | 12.8 | ARI | 11.8 | PHI |
Malik NabersNeutral
| Player | Week | Opponent | Multiplier | Read |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Evans | 2 | MIA | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Mike Evans | 3 | ARI | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Mike Evans | 4 | DEN | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Mike Evans | 5 | SEA | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Mike Evans | 6 | WAS | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Mike Evans | 7 | ATL | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Mike Evans | 9 | LV | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Mike Evans | 10 | DAL | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Mike Evans | 11 | MIN | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Mike Evans | 12 | SEA | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Mike Evans | 13 | NYG | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Mike Evans | 14 | LAR | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Mike Evans | 15 | LAC | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Mike Evans | 16 | KC | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Mike Evans | 17 | PHI | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Mike Evans | 18 | ARI | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Malik Nabers | 2 | LAR | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Malik Nabers | 3 | TEN | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Malik Nabers | 4 | ARI | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Malik Nabers | 5 | WAS | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Malik Nabers | 6 | NO | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Malik Nabers | 7 | HOU | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Malik Nabers | 9 | PHI | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Malik Nabers | 10 | WAS | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Malik Nabers | 11 | JAX | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Malik Nabers | 12 | IND | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Malik Nabers | 13 | SF | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Malik Nabers | 14 | SEA | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Malik Nabers | 15 | CLE | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Malik Nabers | 16 | DET | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Malik Nabers | 17 | DAL | 1.00 | Neutral |
| Malik Nabers | 18 | PHI | 1.00 | Neutral |
| 218 |
| 262 |
| Did not play |
| - |
| Mike Evans | 4 | 10.9 | Did not play | - |
| Mike Evans | 5 | 11.5 | Did not play | - |
| Mike Evans | 6 | 14.5 | Did not play | - |
| Mike Evans | 7 | 12.8 | Did not play | - |
| Mike Evans | 9 | 12.7 | Did not play | - |
| Mike Evans | 10 | 14.5 | Did not play | - |
| Mike Evans | 11 | 12.1 | Did not play | - |
| Mike Evans | 12 | 11.5 | Did not play | - |
| Mike Evans | 13 | 12.3 | Did not play | - |
| Mike Evans | 14 | 12.9 | Did not play | - |
| Mike Evans | 15 | 11.8 | Did not play | - |
| Mike Evans | 16 | 12.5 | Did not play | - |
| Mike Evans | 17 | 11.3 | Did not play | - |
| Mike Evans | 18 | 12.9 | Did not play | - |
| Malik Nabers | 1 | 13.9 | Did not play | - |
| Malik Nabers | 2 | 13.6 | Did not play | - |
| Malik Nabers | 3 | 15.1 | Did not play | - |
| Malik Nabers | 4 | 13.6 | Did not play | - |
| Malik Nabers | 5 | 15.6 | Did not play | - |
| Malik Nabers | 6 | 13.9 | Did not play | - |
| Malik Nabers | 7 | 12.4 | Did not play | - |
| Malik Nabers | 9 | 11.6 | Did not play | - |
| Malik Nabers | 10 | 15.6 | Did not play | - |
| Malik Nabers | 11 | 12.2 | Did not play | - |
| Malik Nabers | 12 | 13.7 | Did not play | - |
| Malik Nabers | 13 | 14.0 | Did not play | - |
| Malik Nabers | 14 | 11.9 | Did not play | - |
| Malik Nabers | 15 | 13.5 | Did not play | - |
| Malik Nabers | 16 | 13.5 | Did not play | - |
| Malik Nabers | 17 | 15.5 | Did not play | - |
| Malik Nabers | 18 | 11.6 | Did not play | - |
| About right |
|---|
| Bust |
|---|
| Did not play |
|---|
| Weeks |
|---|
| Mike Evans | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 17 |
| Malik Nabers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 17 |
| Date | Mike Evans | Malik Nabers |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2026 | 4,333 | 6,761 |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4,220 | 6,849 |
| Sep 11, 2026 | 4,138 | 6,578 |
| Sep 10, 2026 | 3,838 | 6,316 |
| Sep 9, 2026 | 3,394 | 6,496 |
| Sep 8, 2026 | 3,333 | 6,552 |
| Sep 7, 2026 | 3,387 | 6,736 |
| Sep 6, 2026 | 3,348 | 6,619 |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3,349 | 6,691 |
| Sep 4, 2026 | 3,346 | 6,527 |
| Sep 3, 2026 | 3,462 | 6,232 |
| Sep 2, 2026 | 3,446 | 6,070 |
| Sep 1, 2026 | 3,233 | 6,467 |
| Aug 31, 2026 | 3,161 | 6,502 |
| Aug 30, 2026 | 3,198 | 6,538 |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3,202 | 6,506 |
| Aug 28, 2026 | 3,259 | 6,630 |
| Aug 27, 2026 | 3,189 | 6,672 |
| Aug 26, 2026 | 3,199 | 6,509 |
| Aug 25, 2026 | 3,244 | 6,392 |
| Aug 24, 2026 | 3,222 | 6,417 |
| Aug 23, 2026 | 3,159 | 6,410 |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3,227 | 6,399 |
| Aug 21, 2026 | 3,255 | 6,440 |
| Aug 20, 2026 | 3,269 | 6,511 |
| Aug 19, 2026 | 3,279 | 6,460 |
| Aug 18, 2026 | 3,316 | 6,506 |
| Aug 17, 2026 | 3,270 | 6,447 |
| Aug 16, 2026 | 3,176 | 6,391 |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3,205 | 6,519 |
| Aug 13, 2026 | 3,203 | 6,516 |
| Aug 12, 2026 | 3,232 | 6,568 |
| Aug 11, 2026 | 3,242 | 6,607 |
| Aug 10, 2026 | 3,264 | 6,688 |
| Aug 9, 2026 | 3,360 | 6,698 |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3,386 | 6,715 |
| Aug 7, 2026 | 3,391 | 6,671 |
| Aug 6, 2026 | 3,295 | 6,489 |
| Aug 5, 2026 | 3,325 | 6,459 |
| Aug 4, 2026 | 3,228 | 6,499 |
| Aug 3, 2026 | 3,216 | 6,372 |
| Aug 2, 2026 | 3,244 | 6,719 |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3,229 | 6,819 |
| Jul 31, 2026 | 3,193 | 6,652 |
| Jul 30, 2026 | 3,221 | 6,735 |
| Jul 29, 2026 | 3,217 | 6,750 |
| Jul 28, 2026 | 3,264 | 6,755 |
| Jul 27, 2026 | 3,249 | 6,730 |
| Jul 26, 2026 | 3,183 | 6,735 |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3,113 | 6,755 |
| Jul 24, 2026 | 3,116 | 6,693 |
| Jul 23, 2026 | 3,098 | 6,737 |
| Jul 22, 2026 | 3,078 | 6,753 |
| Jul 21, 2026 | 3,056 | 6,786 |
| Jul 20, 2026 | 3,039 | 6,792 |
| Jul 19, 2026 | 3,042 | 6,791 |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3,087 | 6,777 |
| Jul 17, 2026 | 3,076 | 6,769 |
| Jul 16, 2026 | 3,065 | 6,794 |
| Jul 15, 2026 | 3,059 | 6,807 |
| Jul 14, 2026 | 3,086 | 6,905 |
| Jul 13, 2026 | 3,122 | 6,926 |
| Jul 12, 2026 | 3,147 | 6,913 |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3,144 | 6,928 |
| Jul 10, 2026 | 3,143 | 6,921 |
| Jul 9, 2026 | 3,153 | 6,909 |
| Jul 8, 2026 | 3,152 | 6,954 |
| Jul 7, 2026 | 3,143 | 6,961 |
| Jul 6, 2026 | 3,092 | 7,011 |
| Jul 5, 2026 | 3,152 | 6,969 |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3,155 | 6,965 |
| Jul 3, 2026 | 3,236 | 6,992 |
| Jul 2, 2026 | 3,236 | 7,018 |
| Jul 1, 2026 | 3,253 | 7,040 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | 3,153 | 7,049 |
| Jun 29, 2026 | 3,174 | 7,011 |
| Jun 28, 2026 | 3,264 | 7,038 |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3,152 | 7,048 |
| Jun 26, 2026 | 3,160 | 7,026 |
| Jun 25, 2026 | 3,133 | 6,956 |
| Jun 24, 2026 | 3,104 | 7,019 |
| Jun 23, 2026 | 3,118 | 7,044 |
| Jun 22, 2026 | 3,111 | 7,061 |
| Jun 21, 2026 | 3,057 | 7,007 |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3,053 | 7,027 |
| Jun 19, 2026 | 3,117 | 7,028 |
| Jun 18, 2026 | 3,112 | 7,027 |
| Jun 17, 2026 | 3,132 | 7,032 |
| Jun 16, 2026 | 3,099 | 7,130 |
Dynasty PPR SF
Sep 6, 2026
Dynasty PPR SF TEP
Sep 4, 2026
Dynasty PPR SF TEP
Sep 8, 2026
Redraft PPR SF TEP
Sep 6, 2026
Dynasty PPR SF
Sep 5, 2026