Send Michael Wilson to @austinbull1230 for David Montgomery.
Why this one: You asked for contender deals, so this ranking leads on lineup points and projected wins. @austinbull1230 are rebuilding, so the pieces they would move are the ones with a shelf life. Your lineup is short at RB, about 3.9 points a week behind, and this deal lands there.
You get
David MontgomeryRunning back, HOU. value 2,528, 19.7 pts/wk, age 29.3
Total value 2,528
You send
Michael WilsonWide receiver, ARI. value 2,456, 14.2 pts/wk, age 26.6
Total value 2,456
What it does
- Your lineup
- Your starting lineup: +5.5 points a week
- Projected wins
- Your projected wins, estimated: your season gains about 0.55 of a win over the games you have left
- Your value
- Your trade value: +72 points
- Their lineup
- Their starting lineup: -5.5 points a week
- Value gap
- Value gap between the two sides: 3 percent
Your starting lineup gains +5.5 points a week at RB. Against your remaining schedule that is worth about 0.55 of a projected win. You come out 72 points of trade value ahead.
@austinbull1230 reads as a rebuilder, so the case has to be the value. They take on 72 points less value than they send.
The message
What do you think of me sending you Michael Wilson, and you sending back David Montgomery? On value it is close to even both ways.